Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Common Tator
National Review has always been clueless.

Are you really sure you want to say that? As you know, NR was founded by William F. Buckley, who singlehandedly did more to revive the conservative movement than any other living American.

22 posted on 11/18/2002 8:26:19 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: governsleastgovernsbest
National Review also supports legalization of marijuana.

It is possible for a magazine to be both conservative and clueless. Clueless means gullible and naive, which are two of the characteristics I see in this colummn.

Do you not understand that Powell is an excellent Secretary of State? Not only has he successfully negotiated the Security Council UNANIMOUS decision, but he also got Musharraf on board early on, which contributed to the success of the Afghanistan campaign. He has managed to weave a good delaying tactic in the Palestinian crisis, which has allowed Israel to continue to hunt down terorists. In addition, he has managed to get a huge coalition working with us on the war on terror. The man travels constantly, dows NOT undermine our foreign policy, and does exactly what the president wants.

All of the carping about Powell is ususally from unnamed sources (no doubt State Department Clintonista career types) and should be ignored.

Cite evidence that Powell undermines our foreign policy. I bet if you go back and look at the articles you will find they are either from the Post or the NY Times.

29 posted on 11/18/2002 8:33:46 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; Common Tator
A pox on both Woodward and Colin Powell.

If it weren't for Powell, we would not still be dealing with Saddam Hussein. Let's not forget who stopped the pursuit of the fleeing Iraqi troops out of Kuwait

Swartzcoff (sic) wanted to take the war to Bagdad and finish off Saddam.

Thanks to Powell, we didn't. So let's not talk about how much testosterone he has.
33 posted on 11/18/2002 8:51:29 AM PST by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Are you really sure you want to say that? As you know, NR was founded by William F. Buckley

There are two things you know about any man who uses his middle initial in his name. First he deep down thinks he is inferior. He must use an initial to stand out. Secondly he thinks the people he is trying to impress with look up to a middle initial.

Would it imrpress you if I became Common F. Tator?

A person who tries to impress others with the size of his vocabulary does not think his thoughs will impress. He believes himself to be so inferior that he must impress with the size of his vocabulary and not the power of his thoughts.

All William F. Buckley has ever done is try to take credit for being the brilliant thinker behind the revival of the Republican party. He is not. He impressess the unknowing, ignorant and less bright. He does not impress much of anyone else.

There is a reason the Leftist dominated Public TV carried William F. Buckley's Firing Line. If Willian F. Buckley could not convince the viewing public that Republicans are self important pompous a$$es no one could.


39 posted on 11/18/2002 8:59:38 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson