To: Poohbah; exodus
Also more improtantly(there are rich libertarians) we also need to get control of as much of the press as possible. Are the New York and LA times publicly traded if so hostile takeover them fire all the liberal reporters install libertarian/conservative columnist. The liberal TV news networks tend to be owned by megacorps( don't understand why they are liberal for the life of me) which would be nearly impossible to take over.
266 posted on
11/20/2002 6:13:11 AM PST by
weikel
To: weikel; Poohbah
To: Poohbah; exodus
Also more improtantly(there are rich libertarians) we also need to get control of as much of the press as possible. Are the New York and LA times publicly traded if so hostile takeover them fire all the liberal reporters install libertarian/conservative columnist. The liberal TV news networks tend to be owned by megacorps (don't understand why they are liberal for the life of me) which would be nearly impossible to take over.
# 266 by weikel
**********************
That feeling you have, wondering why almost all huge corporations support liberal anti-capitalist politicians and projects, is why so many suspect an international socialist "conspiracy."
274 posted on
11/20/2002 6:51:16 AM PST by
exodus
To: weikel
The liberal TV news networks tend to be owned by megacorps( don't understand why they are liberal for the life of me) which would be nearly impossible to take over.Same reason why people in the biggest state governments aren't states-righters. It's called power corrupting. When they have power, they tend to want to go after the biggest sources of power (which would be the federal gov't). Meat attracting maggots.
It's a myth to say that liberals are anti-corporate. What they want is for all of society to be arranged as one big corporation.
374 posted on
11/20/2002 11:02:43 AM PST by
inquest
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson