[TomGuy]

If that means the clintons,.. then New York, California, and Mass are left enough to put her/them back in.

Add MD, NJ--both typically liberal. And IL, Hillary's home state. Add a smattering of the rest--VT, Michigan, WA state, OR, MN. Her road isn't so uphill.

Why she will run in 2004. She can't take the chance that another female darling of the Democrats, like Pelosi, might emerge during the next six years. And, she hasn't been keeping the Clinton machine working just for fun and games. All she is waiting for right now is for the Dems to dump Al and "beg" her to save them.

[fhayek]

Gore won all those states in 2000, and didn't win. If Bush wins all of the states he won in 2000, he would win 7 extra electoral votes (because redistricting sent added votes to the south and west). This means that he has a little bit of a cushion in case West Virginia or Arkansas don't break for him as they did in 2000. I would worry about Iowa, Arkansas, West Virginia, New Mexico, Oregon and of course Florida. I just don't know how Mrs. Clinton would play in some of these states. I hope that Jeb's performance this year is a good omen.

I don't think that Tennesee would go for Hillary any more than it did for Gore.

[CARepubGal]

Actually, LA & SF may go for the Beast. Manhattan and a few other putrid festering swanps of liberalism may follow. The rest of NY, CA, MA will resoundingly reject the evil Bi^%h of Buchenwald Hitlary!