Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam 'hiding the weapons in mosques'
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | November 17, 2002 | Philip Sherwell and David Wastell

Posted on 11/16/2002 5:32:45 PM PST by MadIvan

Saddam Hussein is hiding chemical and biological weapons supplies in mosques and hospitals in an effort to thwart the new United Nations inspection mission to Baghdad, Iraqi dissidents have revealed.

America says the Iraqi leader has also set up highly-trained "clean-up" squads at his most sensitive secret weapons sites to hide evidence and "sanitise" key facilities even as inspectors are on their way.

Saddam was completing his concealment strategy as French and Russian diplomats wrangled with their American and British counterparts at the UN in New York over the Security Council resolution backing the return of the weapons inspectors.

American intelligence has intensified its information-gathering campaign about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programme as Washington prepares to provide the inspectors with the data to counter Baghdad's concealment efforts.

In a significant breakthrough, the claims of Adnan al-Haideri, an Iraqi civil engineer who defected to America last year and revealed how Saddam was building underground vaults to hide chemical and biological weapons laboratories, have been backed up by US spy plane missions.

The aircraft are fitted with a device that detects underground voids - such as bunkers and tunnels - through variations in the earth's gravitational field. The device found a void where Mr al-Haideri said there was a subterranean nerve-agent laboratory.

Several scientists responsible for Iraq's WMD programme have been shifted out of the country on false passports already to prevent the inspectors questioning them, leading exiles have told The Telegraph.

In the past fortnight two scientists have been sent to Yemen, two elsewhere in the Middle East and one each to Romania, Malaysia and Singapore, according to the Iraqi National Accord (INA), an opposition group with good contacts within the regime.

Dr Ayad Alawi, the INA's leader, also disclosed that the regime was moving documents and materials from weapons laboratories and a ballistic-missile site into hospitals, schools and mosques in the northern cities of Mosul and Kirkuk.

The concealment operation is being co-ordinated by Brig Gen Walid al-Nasri, a trusted aide from Saddam's home region of Tikrit who reports directly to Qusay Hussein, the dictator's second son and head of his powerful State Security Organisation.

An official of the US Defence Intelligence Agency said: "They have trained large numbers of personnel in how to deal with an intrusive inspection regime."

These "clean-up" squads have developed methods for rapidly cleaning and sterilising equipment such as fermenters and centrifuges used to manufacture and store chemical and biological agents.

Iraq has also tried to "bury" small-scale weapons-making activity in larger-scale industrial sites.

British and American intelligence have developed a plan for the weapons inspectors that meets a timetable for attack early next year. They want them to look at about 1,000 sites. About 100 are considered certain to contain evidence of illegal activity.

In his first public comments since the UN resolution was passed, Saddam said yesterday that he had accepted the harsh terms to avert a US attack. After again insisting that Iraq was "devoid of weapons of mass destruction", he used typically vituperative language to denounce Israel, America and the "devils" that followed them.

The first test will come on December 8, the deadline set by UN Resolution 1441 for him to declare Iraq's stocks of biological and chemical agents, its nuclear-bomb programme and remaining ballistic missiles.

"If the Iraqis stick with a declaration of 'nil', then it's war," said Dr John Chipman, director of the International Institute of Strategic Studies, the London-based think-tank that produced a damning recent dossier on Iraq's weapons programme.

He said that Baghdad would most probably come up with a "middling" declaration.

America, backed by Britain, would argue at the Security Council that an incomplete December 8 declaration would put Baghdad in "material breach" of Resolution of 1441. France and Russia would in turn be expected to contend that the inspectors be given the chance to prove that Saddam was lying.

Despite the growing American military build-up, Pentagon planners would still prefer to launch a closely co-ordinated air and ground offensive after late December, when more than 200,000 US troops would be in the region.

The plan is that US intelligence will provide the UN inspectors with the "killer" data once America is ready for the military finale. The inspectors would then make unannounced spot checks while the US kept the sites under surveillance relayed live by unmanned spy drones.

Washington believes the Iraqis will be seen either trying to conceal weapons material or will be caught out. The UN Security Council will be allowed a short time to debate, but the Pentagon will already have launched the final, brief countdown to war.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: biological; chemical; saddam; toast; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: Brad C.
Saddam would use respect for his citizens' private property as an excuse? Like we are supposed to believe that?

This is a man who lets his sons torture Iraqi citizens for fun.

21 posted on 11/16/2002 6:03:52 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
You know, I've been wondering. Why is there no bounty on Saddam's head...at least as much as the going rate for Binny? Seems a reasonable thing....
22 posted on 11/16/2002 6:04:02 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Saddam was completing his concealment strategy as French and Russian diplomats wrangled with their American and British counterparts at the UN in New York over the Security Council resolution backing the return of the weapons inspectors.

Well, DUH! Now he's only had what? at worst 2-3 months and at best 6 months to a year to work on hiding them. The UN wheels grind exccedingly slow and extremely coarse.

They aren't on the side of democracy or the common man. They're on the side of the most vituperative despots the world has ever produced.

23 posted on 11/16/2002 6:05:47 PM PST by America's Resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Saddam Hussein is hiding chemical and biological weapons supplies in mosques and hospitals

No doubt about it. He'd be terminally moronic not to do so, and Saddam is certainly not that. Game playing is his strength, and we're playing to that strength by choosing the resolution/inspections route.

24 posted on 11/16/2002 6:07:29 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I say the first place that we search is his "favorite" palace...
25 posted on 11/16/2002 6:07:33 PM PST by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The aircraft are fitted with a device that detects underground voids - such as bunkers and tunnels - through variations in the earth's gravitational field

I guess this mean that Saddem can run but he can't hide

26 posted on 11/16/2002 6:14:01 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Kill Saddam and see that there are fewer mosques.
27 posted on 11/16/2002 6:16:51 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Saddam Hussein is hiding chemical and biological weapons supplies in mosques ...

And hopefully they will "go off"

28 posted on 11/16/2002 6:19:48 PM PST by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
There is no question in my mind that Saddam will put every woman and child in Iraq into those mosques, right along with the contraband. We've already been treated to a preview of this in Jerusalem. Saddam will make sure his staunch allies, aka the media, broadcast this fact to the world.
29 posted on 11/16/2002 6:19:58 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Strike Iraq and Saddam while the U.N. inspectors are there. Talk about a November surprise. When at war, act like it.
30 posted on 11/16/2002 6:24:59 PM PST by Contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The UN Security Council will be allowed a short time to debate....

Yes, up to 5 minutes will be fine.

OK, time's up. Put down your pencils and turn in your papers.

31 posted on 11/16/2002 6:27:52 PM PST by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I suggest we do it immediately, and damn the UN.

Why not. The Brits have done it before. .

In July 1956, when Egypt's President Gamal Abdel Nasser announced the nationalization of the canal, the Western powers tried in vain to reach an agreement with Egypt on a new form of international control by the 18 nations that regularly used the Canal.

Then in October, against a background of in creasing border clashes, Israel accused Egypt of planning an attack against her and sent the Israeli army across the Sinai Peninsula toward Suez.

Viewing this development as a threat to shipping on the Canal, the British and French landed troops in the Canal zone. The United States opposed this action of its NATO allies as a violation of the principle of self-determination. The American delegation at the United Nations voted in favor of a General Assembly resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire and withdrawal of the invading troops. Great Britain, France, and Israel accepted these terms. In March 1957, under the supervision of a U.N. police force, the Suez Canal was cleared of wreckage and opened to shipping. - Tom

32 posted on 11/16/2002 6:27:59 PM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
a device that detects underground voids through variations in the earth's gravitational field

I can't believe this part. If such a device exists Hillary is a sitting duck.

33 posted on 11/16/2002 6:28:07 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Contra
New you won't read in mainstream US papers. LETS ROLL!
34 posted on 11/16/2002 6:28:33 PM PST by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Saddam 'hiding the weapons in mosques'

Oh no . . . Say is isn't so . . . Bcuz such an action would please Ahh-Laa to the enth degree . . . so much so that Saddman would instantly be conveyed to Muzzle-em Pair-o-dice . . . where he could try to futz with his own batch of 72 well armed West Virginia lesbians !!!


35 posted on 11/16/2002 6:30:35 PM PST by GeekDejure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Lots of stuff seems to get hidden in mosques.
36 posted on 11/16/2002 6:31:35 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Suggest duct-taping Kofi Annan to the Mother of All Thermobaric Enemas for Immediate Delivery.

Saddam Hussein mosque die.

With apologies to President Reagan--

Let us turn Iraq into a thousand points of blinding light.

Bomb, but verify.

37 posted on 11/16/2002 6:35:40 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Sure he does. The politically correct Western inspectors, graduates of re-education camps all, wouldn't dare, would they? The ACLU might protest! Saddam's no fool, we are!
38 posted on 11/16/2002 6:36:52 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I am beginning to wonder what is being hidden in mosques in the United States.
39 posted on 11/16/2002 6:37:22 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
ROTFL.......
40 posted on 11/16/2002 6:39:55 PM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson