Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Paroxysm's of Obloquy"
efreedomnews ^ | 11/16/2002 | Jonathan Rhodes

Posted on 11/16/2002 10:10:28 AM PST by efnwriter

efreedomnews         WAR ON TERRORISM - AN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE

"Paroxysm's of Obloquy"
Jonathan Rhodes

efreedomnews.com
November 15, 2002

On October 11, 2002, the Congress of the United States passed a resolution to authorize the president to use the military against Iraq. The Senate followed with a vote of 77 to 23 for the measure. [full text, pdf version Senate vote roll call, House vote roll call

In the Senate 28 of 51 Democratic Senators (55%) voted for the resolution. In the House, 126 of 208 Democratic Representatives (601%) voted for the resolution.

Following the November 5, 2002 election, when the Republican Party, in a mandate not seen since Civil War times, took control of the Congress while holding the White House, the Democratic Party leadership has chosen a political strategy to move further to the left and attack the White House - and the Republican Party - however possible, ignoring the voice of the American people in this past election.

To quote Tom Daschel - I find this "troubling."

The most recent quotes from Senator Daschel are critical of the administration's focus on Iraq, in Mr. Daschel's mind, to the detriment of the focus on al-Qaida. 

"We can't find bin Laden, we haven't made real progress,' the Senate's top Democrat said Thursday afternoon. 'They continue to be as great a threat today as they were one and a half years ago. So by what measure can we claim to be successful so far?"

Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) accused President Bush of treason on the Fox News Hannity and Colmes show, saying,

Bush wants war in Iraq to "pump up his corporate interest" and that the Bush family  "would love to have their war to enhance their oil profits".

Hillary Clinton, Bill Moyers (on NPR), the New York Times, AL Gore, Terry McAuliffe, the list goes on. Since their defeat on November 5, the Democrats have chosen to attack everything Republican as their primary political message to America.

The Democrats are not forwarding programs, plans and recommendations for change to improve the problems they see. The Democrat message is defamation and criticism.

William Bennett, (Secretary of Education and Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities under President Ronald Reagan and Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under President George H.W. Bush.)
called this behavior

"Paroxysms of obloquy"

obloquy
ob•lo•quy [ óbblkwee ]
noun
1. censure: statements that severely criticize or defame somebody
2. disgrace: a state of disgrace brought about by being defamed
[15th century. From late Latin obloquium contradiction, literally talking against, from loqui to talk.]

 

Now, with Osama tapes released on Al Jezeera, al-Qaida "chatter" at an all time high, our troops surrounding Iraq, Saddam shooting at US and British jets in the no-fly zone and "use of military force"/"severe consequences" [code words for 'war']  against Saddam having been approved by the Congress and the UN, the Democrats have purposefully chosen to drive a wedge between the American people. The only crisis the Democratic Party leadership is addressing is their loss of power following the November elections. Strengthening their political base is more important to the Democratic Party leadership than the crises facing our nation.

Remember



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; obloquy; politicsandwar
Democrats Politicize war AGAIN!

Democrat playbook by Ann Coulter:

Name calling 1. "Arguments by demonization, rather than truth and light, can be presumed to be fraudulent."

2. "The ad hominem attack is the liberal's idea of debate. They will consciously hold themselves outside the debate and make snippy personal comments about anyone who is actually talking about something."

3. “Liberals don't try to win arguments, they seek to destroy their opponents and silence dissident opinions."

4. "They [liberals] just keep moving fast and shouting out catchphrases to win the battle of the narrative."

DUMB 1. "If liberals were prevented from ever again calling Republicans dumb, they would be robbed of half their arguments." This is how six-year olds argue: They call everything "stupid." The left's primary argument is the angry reaction of a helpless child deprived of the ability to mount logical counterarguments. Someday we will turn to the New York Times editorial page and find the Newspaper of Record denouncing President Bush for being a "penis-head." The "you’re stupid" riposte is part of the larger liberal tactic of refusing to engage ideas. Sometimes they evaporate in the middle of an argument and your left standing alone, arguing with yourself. More often, liberals withdraw figuratively by responding with ludicrous and irrelevant personal attacks. Especially popular are non-sequiturs that are savagely cruel. A vicious personal smear, they believe, constitutes a clever counterargument. Your refusal to submit to name-calling means you are overwhelmed by the force of their argument that you are a penis-head."

2. Yet the compulsion to describe every Republican president as an idiot has been part of the left's re-education efforts for over half a century. Coolidge was dumb, Eisenhower was dumb, Ford was dumb, Nixon was dumb (overshadowed by his pure evil), Quayle (standing in for his boss) was dumb, Reagan was dumb; Bush (43) is dumb. .. Liberals have not only run out of arguments, they've run out of adjectives."

Denying Analogies

1. “Another infantile trope of the left is to deny the relevance of analogies and categories, so you can never trap them. No matter how apt it is, no matter how clearly it exposes the poverty of their logic, liberals always say analogies have "changed the subject...Each case must be treated as if it just emerged from the ether, analyzed in a vacuum apart from any conceivable larger principle."

Propaganda

1. "Liberals conceive of news reporting as political propaganda and assume, therefore, that everyone else does too."

2. "The law imposes rules precisely so that liberals cannot endlessly jawbone hypothetical possibilities until they have their way."

Hypocrisy

1. "When in doubt, accuse conservatives of hypocrisy.”

1 posted on 11/16/2002 10:10:28 AM PST by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
What kind of mental defect causes someone, with no particular basis for credibility of her own,

to believe she can gain support by defaming and criticizing

a leader who is trusted, and even loved, by the majority of intelligent normal adults in the population?

Answer: Malignant narcisssm. Same disorder as Hussein. Lots of crackpot demoshitz seem to share it.
2 posted on 11/16/2002 1:42:26 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson