Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: toddst
The wolves won't be such wonderful company for you if their numbers go up. Backpackers will become endangered, as opposed to wolves. The romance of it goes away quick.

Unless they have rabies, wolves are not dangerous. You have watched one too many disney movies.
9 posted on 11/16/2002 6:36:48 AM PST by BillCompton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: BillCompton
There are signs on the ski lifts at Killington that say: "These woods are as dark and lonely as they were two hundred years ago--don't ski off the marked trails!"
10 posted on 11/16/2002 6:42:54 AM PST by Betteboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BillCompton
I had one for a pet once. He was the sweetest thing imaginable, except for his unbreakable urge to eat my chickens. The reaction he got from dogs we met in the park was remarkable. They would turn inside out when they smelled him. I was training security and guide dogs at the time. He could do either superbly.

Definitely NOT for amateurs, however. You could train him to do anything but could never intimidate him. You definitely couldn't spank him except while he was a puppy.

I still miss him.
11 posted on 11/16/2002 6:59:55 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BillCompton
Unless they have rabies, wolves are not dangerous. You have watched one too many disney movies.

I disagree. Back up your assertion, please. As a varmiter I can tell you that feral dog packs are very dangerous to people. This is well documented throughout the south by surveyers and others working the timber stands. And you are going to tell me that wolf packs are not a threat to humans? I want to see some evidence.

13 posted on 11/16/2002 7:18:02 AM PST by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BillCompton
Unless they have rabies, wolves are not dangerous. You have watched one too many disney movies.

Shall I assume you are not a farmer or rancher?
14 posted on 11/16/2002 7:22:29 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BillCompton
Wolves are dangerous. They are wild animals.
Most of the time they will not approach a human, but a small child alone in the woods and a hungry wolf pack could be a bad combination.

I like wolves. They are a lot more honorable than a lot of humans,, but if I'm alone in the woods where wolves are present, I will have a gun. Just in case.
22 posted on 11/16/2002 9:06:31 AM PST by philetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BillCompton; Straight Vermonter; usconservative; Clemenza
Unless they have rabies, wolves are not dangerous. You have watched one too many disney movies.

They're extrememly dangerous, to America that is.

Enviros put these carnivores where they don't belong and then go about the process of bullying the surrounding communities off their property in order to give these animals "territory". All because suburban pipe-dreaming idiots and "backbackers" get all warm and fuzzy and decide to play God. Meanwhile the elitists among us are using them as a tool to further their agenda.

Most re-intoduced wolves aren't even the natural species. They're hybrids that lose their fear of humans during the "re-introduction" and other interaction.

They and other unatural predators (like the cross-bred inbred "Florida Panthers) are some of the most dangerous creatures on earth. I know this first hand.

My suggestion is if you see one these creatures anywhere near where you live, rid your area of them by any means necessary. Or suffer the consequences.

44 posted on 11/17/2002 3:31:50 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson