To: Rome2000
How can restrictions on non-citizens be unConstitutional? It boggles the mind.
To: savedbygrace
Bcause the Constitution protects every "PERSON" in the US ...
Go look it up....
72 posted on
11/16/2002 3:20:51 AM PST by
KQQL
To: savedbygrace
How can restrictions on non-citizens be unConstitutional? It boggles the mind.Silly me. I always thought that non-citizens were here because the labor supply was necessary, and citizens who are qualified will be hired first.
The rational solution is simple. Send home non-citizens as soon as their permission to be here expires. Close the borders until the security mess is cleared up. Fine and jail those who knowingly hire or abet illegals.
If that doesn't happen, soon, there will be a continual, irreversible lose of jobs, freedoms, and security for US citizens.
78 posted on
11/16/2002 3:49:59 AM PST by
grania
To: savedbygrace
How can restrictions on non-citizens be unConstitutional? It boggles the mind. You must not have read the part that said:
Congress shall make no law restricting the right to Jihad.
105 posted on
11/16/2002 6:17:01 AM PST by
Samwise
To: savedbygrace
Must be using The New International Version of the Constitution.
113 posted on
11/16/2002 6:42:36 AM PST by
gitmo
To: savedbygrace
The article does not say. It would seem the judge only temporarily blocked the rule, until the trial. The outcome of the trial being the deciding factor of whether or not it is unConstitutional.
Of course, if the Constitution can be construed to say an unborn child may be legally killed, it can be construed to say anything.
131 posted on
11/16/2002 9:41:46 AM PST by
TheDon
To: savedbygrace
I bet it wouldn't be hard to find a liberal judge to find that the language in the Constitution that restricts the Presidency to citizens is un-Constitutional.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson