[savedbygrace]

How can restrictions on non-citizens be unConstitutional? It boggles the mind.

[KQQL]

Bcause the Constitution protects every "PERSON" in the US ...
Go look it up....

[grania]

How can restrictions on non-citizens be unConstitutional? It boggles the mind.

Silly me. I always thought that non-citizens were here because the labor supply was necessary, and citizens who are qualified will be hired first.

The rational solution is simple. Send home non-citizens as soon as their permission to be here expires. Close the borders until the security mess is cleared up. Fine and jail those who knowingly hire or abet illegals.

If that doesn't happen, soon, there will be a continual, irreversible lose of jobs, freedoms, and security for US citizens.

[Samwise]

How can restrictions on non-citizens be unConstitutional? It boggles the mind.

You must not have read the part that said:

Congress shall make no law restricting the right to Jihad.

[gitmo]

Must be using The New International Version of the Constitution.

[TheDon]

The article does not say. It would seem the judge only temporarily blocked the rule, until the trial. The outcome of the trial being the deciding factor of whether or not it is unConstitutional.

Of course, if the Constitution can be construed to say an unborn child may be legally killed, it can be construed to say anything.

[PeoplesRepublicOfWashington]

I bet it wouldn't be hard to find a liberal judge to find that the language in the Constitution that restricts the Presidency to citizens is un-Constitutional.