Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Park Rising
TechCentralStation ^ | 11/14/2002 | Stephen W. Stanton

Posted on 11/15/2002 6:22:37 AM PST by hchutch

A recent column titled "South Park Republicans" challenged conservative stereotypes by suggesting that a many Republican voters are more inclined to watch Comedy Central than the Christian Broadcasting Network. The piece struck a chord. Actually, it struck several. You can read the reaction for yourself by doing a Google search for "South Park Republicans." Responses range from enthusiastic support to outright ridicule.

A few clarifications are in order. First, not all viewers of "South Park" are Republicans. Certainly, not all of Barbara Streisand's listeners are steadfast Democrats. And the concept of South Park Republicans is not new. Back in 2000, an article was published detailing The Inherent Conservatism of "South Park". The term "South Park Republicans" was first coined by Andrew Sullivan.

Some readers rightly noted that there is not necessarily a dichotomy between South Park Republicans and the Christian right. According to the official South Park website, "members of the Christian right have condemned the show for being bad for practically anyone who wants to go to heaven." However, many Christian conservatives agree with their more secular brethren on the issues of smaller government, lower taxes, fewer regulations, and personal responsibility. Indeed, many conservative Christians responded favorably to the article. One reader began her supportive email, "As a twenty-something, conservative, Christian who appreciates the humor of South Park…"

Many readers tried to debunk the existence of South Park Republicans based on a simple equation: Republican minus religion equals libertarian (they insist on a lowercase "L"). The logic is reminiscent of those demanding that "Jews for Jesus" call themselves plain old Christians. (Too many "J" words, evidently.) More importantly, not all South Park Republicans are libertarians. There is no single "South Park Republican" platform. They have different views on drugs, guns, abortion and Social Security. In addition, South Park Republicans are not uppercase Libertarians for one simple reason. They vote for Republicans. In fact, voting Republican is one of the group's two defining characteristics.

The other defining characteristic is a visible disconnect from the stereotypical Republican, an affluent, religious, white, male, moralist. In contrast, South Park Republicans can be any age, any color and any religion. Unlike archetypal Christian conservatives, they do not find much of modern pop culture offensive. In fact, they love it. They enjoy the non-Christian mysticism of Star Wars, the acrobatic violence of Jackie Chan, and the comedic vulgarity of Chris Tucker. The Christian right observes pop culture. South Park Republicans live pop culture, invoking movie quotes in casual conversation far more often than the Lord's name.

In this respect, South Park Republicans are a far cry from Rod Dreher's "granola conservatives." Dreher, who writes for the conservative National Review, admits that he has "a disdain for, or at least a healthy suspicion of, mass culture." South Park Republicans do not disdain mass culture because they are mass culture. Sure, some SPR's eat free-range chicken and organic vegetables like Dreher, but as a group, they are more likely to eat at Taco Bell. To the extent there is an overlap at all, granola conservatives represent a small fraction of South Park Republicans.

Different South Park Republicans often describe themselves as conservatives, libertarians, classical liberals, pragmatists, constitutionalists, or "just your average Joe." However, when election day comes around, they all generally vote for Republican candidates. But their vote must be earned. They are idealists, perhaps even pragmatists, but not party loyalists. In fact, the creators of the South Park TV show brutally satirized the current president in their short-lived series, "That's My Bush."

What's Under the Tent?

South Park Republicans each vote Republican for their own reasons. Some agree with every plank in the party's platform, in spite of having a nose ring and purple mohawk. However, most view Republicans as the lesser of two evils. Due to the quirks of our electoral system, candidates require a plurality to win, not a majority. If Libertarians wrested away half of the Republican votes in every major election, Democrats would hold nearly every seat in Congress. South Park Republicans want to avoid that, even if it means voting for Republicans when third party candidates may better reflect their views.

Democrats are keenly aware of electoral calculus. Long ago, they assembled an unlikely coalition to exploit it. For decades, Democrats have held their multifaceted party together with tape and glue. Today, former Klansman and current Senator Robert Byrd is in the same party as African-American Georgia Rep. Billy McKinney, who blamed his daughter's congressional defeat on a Jewish plot, though he did not mention Jewish Democrats by name, such as former Democratic VP candidate Joe Lieberman. Democrats hold together environmentalists protesting big oil in the same party as the union auto workers who depend on cheap oil and even the trial lawyers that skim 30% from whichever side wins. The Democrats have room for almost everybody in their big tent.

When you lift the flap to peek inside, who will you see in the Republican tent? After looking at the ad hoc membership of the left, it becomes easy to accept the South Park crowd as a viable Republican caucus, numerically dwarfing other factions such as, say, the Log Cabin Republicans. Of course, with congressional control and a sitting president, there must be far more people - and far greater diversity - in the Republican party than Hollywood might have you believe. Hilary Clinton got it half right: The right wing is truly vast, encompassing a vibrant and diverse base holding many different priorities. However, there is no conspiracy; the party is not monolithic.

In fact, the party is evolving rapidly. The newest and youngest members do not look, act, or think like the old guard. Generation X grew up with computers and cable TV. They entered the workforce at the same time as the Internet and embrace technology. They access the information and entertainment they want when they want it. They are individualists, with little patience for censorship or prejudice. Generation Y grew up even later, after political correctness had already firmly taken root. They now rebel against the very institutions, such as racial quotas, that were put in place by the progressives who fought the conservatism of the '60s.

Yet voters continue to see the same gray-haired faces representing the Republican party, in the same suits, with familiar priorities. But that will not last. Political parties are dynamic and they evolve. The South Park Republicans represent a large and growing caucus, espousing many of the party's core ideals, though rejecting the intolerance and censorship of certain religious elements.

South Park Republicans are very real and candidates should listen. Within two days of publication, the previous column generated email from many self-described South Park Republicans. They included a middle aged mother who finds the TV show tasteless, an economics professor, a blue collar worker, an old Truman Democrat, a naval veteran, a home-schooled teen, several Log Cabin Republicans, a tax lawyer, and a 31 year old, Jewish, mink-coat wearing, politically incorrect woman.

The Republican party cannot hold its current majority without this increasingly powerful caucus. The party can continue to adapt and prevail, or splinter and lose. The great thing about big tents is that they are portable. The Republicans of the future do not have to set up the big tent on the same exact political turf of yesteryear.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigtent; gop; southpark; southparkrepublicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-252 next last
To: fissionproducts
No, not arbitrary with respect to the activity of a criminal predator, but most importantly the most dangerous of all organized predators, the Government.
141 posted on 11/15/2002 8:33:15 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
How does anyone enjoy Fourier mathematics? Im doing it now for signals its horrid.
142 posted on 11/15/2002 8:33:23 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: oldvike
Excellent, the Song have couresy of KazzaL, but the other clip kills me!
143 posted on 11/15/2002 8:35:04 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts
"Me too. This sums up the sort of Republican I am. I am certainly not a religous person. Religion requires you to supress your intellect."

So true, same goes for church. Fortunately God prefers for people to use the brains He gives them. Unfortunately religion and church have little to do with learning about and knowing God these days.

144 posted on 11/15/2002 8:35:24 AM PST by Is2C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
The US government should hire the writers of South Park, and have them do a similar series, based on the kids of the mullahs, who rule Iran. Beaming that series into Iran would bring down the Islamic theocracy in short order. Then, on to Saudi!
145 posted on 11/15/2002 8:35:29 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

Comment #146 Removed by Moderator

To: philosofy123
FORGIVE ME PEOPLE! How did I forget the vilest politician in history: Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Dy-NASTY!
147 posted on 11/15/2002 8:37:47 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1; Ramius; Bear_in_RoseBear
EEEEK! I can't handle this conversation!


148 posted on 11/15/2002 8:37:54 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts
Religion requires you to supress your intellect.

Pretty odd observation, considering that religion is generally a contemplative pursuit......

149 posted on 11/15/2002 8:38:34 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Well, the problem is that engineers got a hold of the beauty of the Fourier series and then abuse you with it. Stand back. Consider the vector space of real-to-real functions. The cardinality of this set is of a higher "level of infinity" than that of the reals. Yet, it has a countable basis. Moreover each member of the basis is periodic. Moreover, the basis is easily-describable. Absolutely gorgeous idea.
150 posted on 11/15/2002 8:39:10 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
"New York City is ready to evacuate if Hillary Clintons a$$ gets any bigger" ---- South Park news caster.
151 posted on 11/15/2002 8:39:25 AM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts
Reliogion is the contemplative pursuit of the knowledge of God.

A Church is a hierarchical political manned institution....

152 posted on 11/15/2002 8:40:24 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
This article pretty much described me. I love the show, have been known to eat at Taco Bell, am more of a libertarian conservative than a Christian conservative because I believe in secular government, and am a fiscal conservative.

I think this name could stick.

153 posted on 11/15/2002 8:41:59 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Just a summation of some UGLY trignometric integrals to me.
154 posted on 11/15/2002 8:43:26 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts
No I think you are off a bit. Modern American Christianity has indeed devolved into a foot washing cult, but historically Western Christianity allowed and even encouraged intellectual pursuits in all fields.
155 posted on 11/15/2002 8:44:59 AM PST by junta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
number two

Huh-huh-huh, you said "number two".

(I'm a Beavis and Butthead Republican)

156 posted on 11/15/2002 8:47:19 AM PST by murdoog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
South Park Republicans

By Stephen W. Stanton

Picture a typical Republican. Perhaps you see images of George Bush, John Ashcroft, Ronald Reagan, or maybe even Alex P. Keaton. Basically, many people think Republicans are a bunch of stodgy white guys with money.

Times are changing. The Republican A-list now includes Colin Powell, Christie Whitman, J.C. Watts, and Condoleeza Rice. Women and minorities have been making great strides in the party, but they generally dress, talk, and act like their predecessors. You are more likely to find them at a formal reception than a rock concert.

If Republicans are so different from mainstream America, then who voted for them? The nation has more Republican congressmen and state governors than any other political party, plus control of the White House. There are not enough Alex P. Keatons to account for these election results. Our nation is among the most diverse on earth. Half of the voters are women, a quarter are minorities. There are millions of union workers, retirees, immigrants, government workers, customer service employees, and individuals in low paying jobs, unemployed or on some form of public assistance. All of these groups are expected to lean left. Surely, the stodgy, affluent, religious white guys are outnumbered in the electorate by a huge margin. Yet Republicans candidates still do well. How is that possible?

The answer could very well be the "South Park Republicans." The name stems from the primetime cartoon "South Park" that clearly demonstrates the contrast within the party. The show is widely condemned by some moralists, including members of the Christian right. Yet in spite of its coarse language and base humor, the show persuasively communicates the Republican position on many issues, including hate crime legislation ("a savage hypocrisy"), radical environmentalism, and rampant litigation by ambitious trial lawyers. In one episode, industrious gnomes pick apart myopic anti-corporate rhetoric and teach the main characters about the benefits of capitalism.

South Park Republicans are true Republicans, though they do not look or act like Pat Robertson. They believe in liberty, not conformity. They can enjoy watching The Sopranos even if they are New Jersey Italians. They can appreciate the tight abs of Britney Spears or Brad Pitt without worrying about the nation's decaying moral fiber. They strongly believe in liberty, personal responsibility, limited government, and free markets. However, they do not live by the edicts of political correctness.

The South Park Republicans are an incredibly diverse group encompassing a variety of nontraditional conservatives, such as the Terminator, Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bruce Willis supported Republicans because of their commitment to lower taxes and fiscal discipline. Rap artist and movie actor LL Cool J recently endorsed NY governor George Pataki.

The most important South Park Republicans are not famous. They are the millions of people of every age, race, sex, and religion that generally agree that government spending is usually not the best way to deal with the nation's problems. Many of these individuals can tell you why Ayn Rand should displace some other authors in high school literature classes. They know firsthand from endless hours at the DMV, at the post office, and preparing income tax forms that government wastes time and money. They know a nation cannot tax its way to greatness.

If he were alive today, John F. Kennedy could very well be a South Park Republican. He rightly proclaimed, "An economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget—just as it will never produce enough jobs or profits." You read that right. JFK was a supply-side tax cutter. His alleged private exploits would place him squarely within the South Park wing of the Republican Party.

Sound farfetched? There have been many Democrats that changed parties. Ronald Reagan, Senator Phil Gramm, and Mayor Mike Bloomberg were all once Democrats that became Republicans. The Democratic Party moved left, and the people that stood in the same place increasingly found their views shared by the elephants of the GOP. But not all elephants belong in the same herd. Pat Buchanan pushes a Christian/protectionist agenda that has absolutely nothing in common with the Libertarian folks who support free trade and complete separation of church and state. Depending on whom you ask, "Conservative" can mean smaller government of lower hemlines. (Hint: South Park Republicans are more likely to get Cosmo than the Weekly Standard.)

The South Park Republicans are not new, though they may now be more vocal. The party finally seems willing to embrace members that listen to the hard rock and rap music long denounced by the old guard. Heck, even vegetarians are welcome.

The media generally misrepresents Republicans as religious rich white males. This is patently false. Half of the voting public is Republican. They watch R rated movies, enjoy a few drinks at happy hour, and even go to the occasional Wrestlemania. Hopefully, the South Park Republicans will shatter the unfair stereotype and set the record straight. As Cartman would say, "That would be pretty sweet."

157 posted on 11/15/2002 8:50:30 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Bump back at you! Cartman rules! And remember....he's not fat, he's big bonned! ;-)
158 posted on 11/15/2002 8:51:54 AM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Alex and I were dying we were laughing so hard! That episode was the best in a while.
159 posted on 11/15/2002 8:52:47 AM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
That LOTR episode of Southpark ruled.

Oh, yeah. Mapping the One Ring to a porn film was a piece of absolute parodic genius - it doesn't sound like it would work, but for those who didn't see it, trust me, it was brilliant.

160 posted on 11/15/2002 8:52:59 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson