She is for abortion, against a ban on partial birth abortion. No practicing Catholic would condone infanticide
Sorry, not all Catholics believe the same way. That's abundantly clear from over a year of conversation with Catholics here on top of my years of studying the religion - no matter what is in writing. And I'd be more worried about a pawn voting the way the pope tells her to vs. someone who actually represents their constituency. Or perhaps it would be ok with you to have a Catholic on the hill voting to burn heretics cause that's what the Pope says should be done.. Not a cheap shot, just a sobering notion for you to consider - for all of us to consider.
She should neither be a pawn of the wacko liberal extremists nor of the Church of Rome. What she should be is a representative of the people (all the people) that sent her there. And foisting minority extremist views on the majority is not representation. Our Constitution and form of government provide for rule by the majority with protection for the minority view. Liberals have tried for 50 years to reverse or even destroy that by pushing the minority view and quashing majority dissent by every means possible. And it's time for Conservatives to set things aright. Bella may be a leader of something; but that something happens to be the minority. And the only reason there is light on her is to give the appearance that the Dims have something to talk about which presumabely is important.
This is all a sideshow. The Dims don't have a message and still need to look as though they matter to anything. For now, they have made themselves an irrelevant freak show. We should put our minds now to making sure that our message continues to get out. When people hear our message and see the Dems for what they are, Republicans get elected. Never give up, never surrender, never stop putting your best foot forward. Let's keep freepin!
No, but many people the "call themselves Catholic" do.