Skip to comments.
Iraq Said to Try to Buy Antidote Against Nerve Gas
The New York Times ^
| 11/12/2002
| JUDITH MILLER
Posted on 11/11/2002 7:23:54 PM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Pokey78; Nogbad; keri
There's something I don't understand about reports like this, and also about the reports regarding Iraq trying to purchase the metal tubing required for a nuclear weapon. Why wouldn't Iraq have built the required infrastructure to make such things themselves? Doesn't Iraq have chemical manufacturing factories and metal machining facilities? Wouldn't these be a high priority for any country, whether aiming at a peacetime economy or a wartime economy?
21
posted on
11/11/2002 9:26:43 PM PST
by
Mitchell
To: concerned about politics
And to think the lame duck Democrats still haven't givin the President a homeland security measure. They still want the union vote ahead of the lives of American citizens.What's really funny is the way the Dims were SCREAMING for Union "protection" for Homeland Security positions, and at the same time, ordering their Unions to send dock workers on strike (to damage the economy, and Bush).
The first thing people think of when you say "Union" is "strike". Which is the last thing you want to hear when you're talking about Homeland Security.
Shot themselves in the groin on that one, didn't they?
22
posted on
11/11/2002 9:27:41 PM PST
by
WarSlut
To: Dallas
I'm wondering, does Saddam have people who're willing to die for him, people who don't have their family being held hostage? I mean, are there true fanatics willing to give all to/for Saddam like martyrs for Islamism?
23
posted on
11/11/2002 9:34:00 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; PatrickHenry
Info ping!
24
posted on
11/11/2002 9:35:57 PM PST
by
Scully
To: WarSlut
Shows their arrogant disregard for the intelligence of the American people ... people who voted hard against them on Nov 5th, but don't let that secret out.
25
posted on
11/11/2002 9:36:07 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
To: tet68
"The Iraqis must know that we are not going to use such agents against them, because we don't have chemical weapons," Dr. Franz said. Excuse me Doc, but you just don't seem to get the point. They want this because they are going to use such agents against US.
I believe that *was* his point.
He was saying, "since Iraq wouldn't need nerve agent antidotes for defense against us, his ordering the antidotes is pretty clear evidence that a) he's got nerve agents himself, and b) he intends to use them."
26
posted on
11/11/2002 9:41:33 PM PST
by
Dan Day
To: Pokey78
Good Lord! He is going to use nerve agents, swell!
To: Scully
Thanks for the ping! :-))
To: WarSlut
Shot themselves in the groin on that one, didn't they?
LOL! It would have to be an accidental shooting from point-blank range for any dimbulb to hit a target that small.
29
posted on
11/11/2002 9:52:12 PM PST
by
Augie
To: Pokey78
QUICK!
Someone call Scott Ritter and ask HIM what he thinks this means....
Semper Fi
To: Pokey78
atropine and obidoxime are antidotes for organophosphate insecticide poisonings. however when we said we would raid iraq, i don't think we meant spray it with.
To: Unmarked Package
I like your style!
But what would the U.N. say??
/sarcasm
To: Pokey78
Dave Franz, a former director of the Army's bio-defense lab at Fort Detrick, Md., and Frederick R. Sidell, a chemical agents expert who worked at the Army Medical Institute of Chemical Defense, agreed that Iraq's orders raised concern because there were virtually no peaceful uses for that much atropine.
Well, you can get pretty stoned off atropine. It's an antispasmotic/muscle relaxant. Well, those assholes are gonna need some muscle relaxants after we drop our stinky load all over their pitiful excuse for a country!
Along with scopalomine and other alkaloids, atropine is found in both Jimson Weed and Belladona. Atropine was once widely used to treat asthma.
33
posted on
11/11/2002 11:56:08 PM PST
by
Hemlock
To: Pokey78; HalfIrish; NMC EXP; OKCSubmariner; Travis McGee; t-shirt; DoughtyOne; SLB; Sawdring; ...
The Iraqis must know that we are not going to use such agents against them, because we don't have chemical weapons," Dr. Franz said.
As I predicted months ago, we are going to take lots of casualties from Saddam's CBR arsenal unless we give him "an out"--meaning, that we guarantee him amnesty and immunity from prosecution in return for his acceptance of permanent exile in the country of his choice. As Rummy has since stated, buy him a plane ticket. However, thus far the US has refused to give him the guarantees from prosecution that he would require before even considering taking us up on this offer. The Administration should act immediately to give him such guarantees as the surest and swiftest and least costly way in terms of men and material to achieve regime change in Iraq.
To: Pokey78
"Vee half no weapons of mass destruction, so we reject you access to Presidential palaces. And if you step foot in our country, vee ville gas all of you, dead!"
35
posted on
11/12/2002 6:15:41 AM PST
by
aShepard
To: rightwing2
Thanks for the heads up to your views!
To: Mitchell; keri; swarthyguy
Why wouldn't Iraq have built the required infrastructure to make such things themselves? I can't answer that,
but here is something I just heard now.
Three months ago
(that is, in August)
Pakistan provided North Korea with centrifuges
to help them produce Plutonium.
Did any of you know that??
37
posted on
11/12/2002 9:20:03 PM PST
by
Nogbad
To: Pokey78
Coming from the New York Times, this sounds more like scare hype, designed to frighten the troops and give the anti-war troops some ammunition.
38
posted on
11/12/2002 9:50:46 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: Nogbad
Three months ago (that is, in August) Pakistan provided North Korea with centrifuges to help them produce Plutonium. Thanks; I hadn't seen this yet. It turns out that there's a Washington Post article on it; here's a link. But that article doesn't mention centrifuges; in fact, it goes out of the way to say that there's no specific evidence, no "smoking gun." Where did you hear that centrifuges were involved?
39
posted on
11/12/2002 10:27:40 PM PST
by
Mitchell
To: Mitchell
Source is John Batchelor of WABC:
who got it from the Washington Post website,
but added that the aid consisted of gas centrifuges
to make plutonium.
He did not indicate where he obtained this information.
40
posted on
11/12/2002 10:41:50 PM PST
by
Nogbad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson