Now, I'll try one more time to make what I consider the important point of all three of these posts. Imagine that the situation had been reversed and your candidate had lost. Imagine that the loss were a result of false accusations that she is not sufficiently pro-life and that the winning candidate had received half a million dollars in money from outside the state. I'm sure you believe that she'd never say anything like what Dr. Cooksey said, but imagine that in a moment of hurt and frustration she had said something that was ungracious and unbecoming. If a volunteer from the winning campaign had said about her what you said about Dr. Cooksey, would that make you more likely or less likely to give enthusiastic support to that candidate's runoff campaign?
NO. What Dr Cooksey did is inexcusable. Period. It was unacceptable for a man and peevishly unprofessional for a former elected representative. Whatever was or was not said about him it is history, pre-November 5th. It is now post-November 5th, his campaign is over and he is history. In light of his behavior I can't help but feel that that is a real good thing for the people of Louisiana.
Now, that is it. I'm not considering, discussing or talking about this little man any more.