Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congresswoman-elect Linda Sanchez: "How are we going to protect our own people from ex-military?
O'Reilly Factor | Nov 6, 2002

Posted on 11/08/2002 5:53:16 PM PST by John Jorsett

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-284 next last
To: DoughtyOne
The real question is: How do we protect our military from Linda Sanchez?

Liberty
261 posted on 11/09/2002 9:52:24 PM PST by Liberty Valance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
What Sanchez should have asked is how can we help our ex-military. This is in no respect speaking of John Muhammad in any way.

I do believe the guys that serve in combat in some of these God forsaken countries need plenty of help. Even the hardest of the hard. They may train for years to go out and do what they do, but once they actually are out there in jungles and desert, a life they have never lived before, with dead bodies all around them, being shot out, not a decent meal, not bathing.

The majority of these guys (including my son) that are going to lay their lives on the line for us are still in their teens, some gunho to go. My son is not in his teens, but he has already done 2 terms in Bosnia. I remember a letter from him during one winter, where he wrote, Mom, our ghettos would be considered Beverly Hills to this. The soldiers were sleeping in tents in the winter, rain, sleet, and snow. My son has been in the military for 10 years and next month he will sign up again. Whenever he decides to get out or retire, if he needs help, I hope help will be there for him. But then I know that it will.

262 posted on 11/09/2002 10:00:51 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
For now they are safe. In two or four years who knows? Hopefully we can retire her and her sister by then. Her other two sisters, Feinstein and Boxer are clearer threats.
263 posted on 11/09/2002 10:05:34 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Stupid bint.
264 posted on 11/09/2002 11:22:46 PM PST by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Someone should tip Disney off to the Mickey pic on the La Voz de Atzlan page. Eisner & Company don't take kindly to anyone borrowing Uncle Walt's characters, and I'm sure they'd be happy to hassle the Atzlan crowd for us.
265 posted on 11/09/2002 11:32:33 PM PST by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: CobolKing
CobolKing

You worked for Tim? ..so did I

266 posted on 11/09/2002 11:43:04 PM PST by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
: ) Howdy , Are you 'Pete the Pirate ' from the Dornan campaign ?
267 posted on 11/09/2002 11:55:34 PM PST by cousinkoala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Pa' fuera
Conveniently tucked away from the Mexican ghettoes she helps to create with her illegal immigrant advocacy.

No "Barrio Babe",she! I'm not all that certain she has ever been a fan of illegal immigrants until recently,either. Didn't she go by her married Anglo surname before she got into politics?

268 posted on 11/10/2002 5:02:38 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: willyone
Legalize them all George.

That's "Jorge",and he needs to legalize as many of them as he can so that his nephew Jorge "The Mexican" Bush will already have a voter base when he enters the fambly bidnez.

269 posted on 11/10/2002 5:05:05 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: willyone
I wonder where all the Calif. refugees will go?

They are already polluting Nevada,Colorado,New Mexico,Oregon,and Washington state with their presence. Now that they have suceeded in making Ca unliveable,they don't want to live there either.

270 posted on 11/10/2002 5:08:04 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Pa' fuera
Mexico's press and government see all people of Mexican descent within the US as tools to gain more power and stimulate the Mexican economy.

And this includes the wife and children of certain prominent American political families.

271 posted on 11/10/2002 5:09:42 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: willyone
Votes and money are all that matter. Screw the country and its traditions.

Yup. Bubba-2's nephew will need the votes,and the rest of the Bush family can use the Mexican oil contracts they will get.

272 posted on 11/10/2002 5:11:46 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Who knows what I'll be in another 10 years.

With any luck at all,"American". I suspect you will have to insist on it,though.

273 posted on 11/10/2002 5:26:35 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
Are you 'Pete the Pirate ' from the Dornan campaign?

Nope,but I'm a B-1 Bob fan.

274 posted on 11/10/2002 5:28:13 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Your statement is very informative, however, I would never consider a Cuban, a Hispanic. I've always considered hispanic to be mexican.

That's exactly the problem. Names have been thrown around so carelessly by the media that names have lost all of their original meaning.

"Hispania" was the name of the Roman province of Spain just as "Britannia" was the name of the Roman province of Britain, Aegyptos was the name of the Roman province of Egypt and Africa was the name of the Roman province of North Africa.

Most Cuban Americans trace both sides of the family back to Spain and can tell you exactly what region of Spain each side of the family came from. Fidel Castro's paternal side of the family, for example, was from the northwest Spanish region of Galicia as was my own paternal side of the family. Cubans, therefore, are truly of "Hispanic" descent.

The Mexican Mestizo who is mostly of Pre-Columbian Indian stock wants nothing to do with the name "Hispanic" as it denotes the Spaniards who conquered his ancestors in the 1500's.

The name situation would be analogous to having, say, American Indians labelled "Britons" because the American Indians were conquered by English-speaking men whose roots went back to "Britannia" and the American Indians speak English today.

In such a scenario, both the American Indian and the actual British who come to the USA are stripped of their cultural heritage. The American Indian is saddled with the name of the hated conqueror. The British bloke, in turn, is left to wonder why, in the USA, "Britons" are expected to look like Cherokees and why he keeps being asked if his reservation runs a casino.


"Hispania". From "Neuster Zeitungs Atlas. Alter und Neuer Erdkunde", ca 1855.


Roman denarius, ca. 134 A.D. of the Roman Emperor Hadrian honoring the Roman province of Hispania (Spain)


Roman Bronze As, ca. 154 A.D. of the Roman Emperor Antoninus Pius honoring the Roman province of Britannia. Reverse inscription: BRITANNIA COS. IIII S. C.


Roman denarius, ca. 134 A.D. of the Roman Emperor Hadrian honoring the Roman province of Africa (North Africa, excluding Egypt which was called Aegyptos and was a separate province)


Roman denarius, ca. 134 A.D. of the Roman Emperor Hadrian honoring the Roman province of Aegyptos (Egypt)

275 posted on 11/10/2002 5:50:55 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
Here's something else I really have to ask: just how literate are the Mexican illegals in the SPANISH language?

According to U.N. statistics, in 1990, the illiteracy rate for Mexicans over the age of 25 was 12.7% for men and 20.4% for women.

The question then becomes: What is the sociological profile of the average Mexican illegal?

If the poorest of the poor are the ones flooding across the Rio Grande, then the illiteracy rate would probably be greater in that sub-group than in the general Mexican population.

276 posted on 11/10/2002 6:10:23 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
" wonder do they know what kind of brutal culture the Aztecs were with its mass ritual human sacrifices."

Don't know how that can be any different from the German Octoberfests and German-Americans glorifying their roots considering Germany's violent,aggressive past and its concentration camps and crematoriums for virtual human sacrifices.

Germany's Nazi past, in historical terms, was a recent event without any direct link to most Americans of German descent.

The German roots that produced Nazism in Europe produced American warriors such as General Dwight D. Eisenhower, Admiral Chester Nimitz and General Carl Spaatz, commander of the U.S Strategic Air Forces in Europe during World War II.

A more apt analogy may be our Catholic and Protestant ancestors burning each other at the stake for heresey and the quaint New England Puritans hanging and crushing twenty of their neighbors to death because of "witchcraft".

Then again, we don't glorify such historical incidents. We admit that they were wrong.

277 posted on 11/10/2002 6:45:13 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
That's exactly the problem. Names have been thrown around so carelessly by the media that names have lost all of their original meaning.

And this includes the work of the Miami-based Spanish-language TV networks. They propagate the idea of a single Hispanic race by calling anyone who speaks Spanish as one of "los nuestros" (ours). Of course, they want to be the network that all of them watch, so they don't want to splinter their audience by making distinctions. I remember one piece on Telemundo where two hispanic or latino soldiers were injured in combat, the anchor said that two off "ours" had been hurt, implying at the same time that they didn't consider the rest of the soldiers to be theirs. Liberalism is alive and well in the Spanish-language press corps, as well.

278 posted on 11/10/2002 7:52:19 AM PST by Pa' fuera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Pa' fuera
And this includes the work of the Miami-based Spanish-language TV networks. They propagate the idea of a single Hispanic race by calling anyone who speaks Spanish as one of "los nuestros" (ours). Of course, they want to be the network that all of them watch, so they don't want to splinter their audience by making distinctions.

TV networks strive for as wide an international audience as possible so, of course, they want to appeal to everyone. From their web page, it appears that Telemundo broadcasts in 112 different TV markets.

In contrast, I remember seeing a bumper sticker while visiting in Miami a few years ago that said, "No me llames Hispano. Soy Cubano."

Con un nombre como "Pa' fuera", supongo que tambien eres Cubano o quizas Puertorriqeño?

279 posted on 11/10/2002 8:27:58 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Con un nombre como "Pa' fuera", supongo que tambien eres Cubano o quizas Puertorriqeño?

Nope, a Spanish-speaking American, and I've got my Mexican slang down pretty good.

280 posted on 11/10/2002 9:06:24 AM PST by Pa' fuera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson