[Hoplite]

No, by Radovan Karadzic's and Slobodan Milosevic's actions.

I guess if you weren't paying attention at the time, it's easy to fall victim to the Serb Nationalist lies and revisionism currently being promulgated on the net.

[inquest]

Are you sure you were paying attention? The war in Bosnia had been over for nearly three years by the time we started bombing Serbia, and there were atrocities to go around on all sides in that conflict. Serbia did nothing to merit the bombing attacks in '99. Unless, of course, you actually believe the KLA-concocted Racak "massacre".

[duckln]

I guess if you weren't paying attention at the time, it's easy to fall victim to the Serb Nationalist lies and revisionism currently being promulgated on the net.

Paying attention to the 'tribunal' videos on the net you can see the 'revisionalism' that was promulgated against the Serbs. The 'team', DelPonte, Nice and Judge May come across as the biggest 'slimeballs' ever.

Milosevic has framed the debate and has won. Not once has he been wrong on the facts and he is the main speaker. Yet everytime a 'witness' gives 'testimony' its riddled with 'lies'and every accusation may so far, IMO was 'perposterous' .

Only Milosevic's explanation makes any sense. Why is that?