To: republicman
The "early sexual exposure" referred to here is most likely way beyond the innocent curiosity-driven experiences of people like us. So I think your diagnosis of "us" is not relevant.
By no means, do I think this in removes any onus of personal responsibilty for this evil pair.
31 posted on
11/08/2002 8:35:16 AM PST by
Bigg Red
To: Bigg Red
--The "early sexual exposure" referred to here is most likely way beyond the innocent curiosity-driven experiences of people like us.--
There was sepculation that something was incestuous. That of course would be as you say. However the only certainty was messing around with little girls when he was young, unusual, yes, but not particularly.
This psychologist is typical of liberals. Nobody can do something horrible unless they are a victim of something.
Maybe Carr was fondling girls because they were deparaved evil little boys from the get go, who only got worse along the way.
--So I think your diagnosis of "us" is not relevant.--
It was also sarcastic. I'm surprised you couldn't tell.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson