[Catspaw]

So...you just made an assumption. You have no proof that Chief Moose is "anti-white." However, you aren't willing to retract your statement. It's too bad you can't admit you're wrong.

[nanny]

[So...you just made an assumption. You have no proof that Chief Moose is "anti-white." However, you aren't willing to retract your statement. It's too bad you can't admit you're wrong.]

I don't think you read my post - did you? I did say I repeated what I had read on FR in postings by people who allegedly live where this man formerly worked. I did take their postings as truth - in that I was wrong.

I still question the chief, and others, in not checking out dark skinned people, contrary to eye witness accounts. Now I did couple that with what I had read on FR and 'questioned' if race could have been his reasoning.

I should have used 'alledged' the statements read on FR. I admitted that - but I still question his actions - I would. question them even if I had read nothing about him on FR .

PEOPLE WERE BEING KILLED and this chief, and apparently others, were disregarding credible evidence. There has to be a reason - what was it? Incompetence? Could be. I will question that. If I had, you probably would have attacked me saying I only questioned his competence because he was black. It is a no win situation.

But no, I wasn't wrong in questioning his actions - and I was only wrong in taking posting on FR as truth. Only those people can answer if it was truthful.