Chief Moose Cost Lives

WASHINGTON – Fox News, CNN, the Washington Post. The interviews lionizing Montgomery County Police Chief Charles A. Moose keep coming. Time magazine named him "Person of the Week." Book deals are in the offing.

His office door is adorned with a huge thank-you letter from area school kids. Fruit baskets, flowers and other gifts continue to arrive from grateful citizens. One Maryland couple gave him a case of champagne.

Sheets spray-painted with "Moose for President" hang from highway overpasses here. There's even a "Chief Moose Fan Club" website replete with songs and poems praising the "superhero." Its founder calls Moose "brilliant."

Part of me doesn't care who gets credit for capturing the Beltway snipers, however misplaced that credit may be, so long as they're off the streets.

My family, like most in the Beltway area, was terrorized by them for three long weeks. After they shot someone near my neighborhood, I set the pump handle at the gas station and jumped back into my car whenever I filled up the tank. I did most of the shopping, zigzagging in the parking lot and feeling like an idiot. No more walking to school; my wife and I drove our school-aged child right up to the school's side entrance.

We were just as paralyzed and nerve-racked as everyone else around the capital, as the snipers methodically picked off 13 random people. Sounds crazy to live in such fear given the tiny statistical probability of being shot. But unless you were here, you can't fully understand what a nightmare it was – worse even than the D.C. anthrax scare. You can avoid opening your mail, or take drugs if you're exposed to germ spores. But there's no antibiotic for a bullet to the head.

At the same time, another part of me knows that rewarding incompetence validates incompetence, and can even institutionalize it, leading to more mistakes in similar cases down the road.

It's bad enough that we reward incompetence in public education. Doing it in law enforcement, where mistakes can cost lives, should never be tolerated, especially when Islamic terrorism now threatens us in our homes.

Truth is, John Allen Muhammad and John Lee Malvo, both black Muslims, were caught in spite of Moose, not because of him.

Racial hypersensitivity delayed their capture, costing lives. Moose, a staunch foe of racial profiling, refused to go after suspects of color. (He and his second wife, a white civil-rights lawyer, are pathologically race-conscious, a matter I'll return to later.)

The sniper task force, which Moose led from start to finish, questioned white men right up to the day arrest warrants were issued for Muhammad and Malvo.

Take Tim Carter and his boss, Mark Fanning. On Oct. 22, task-force detectives paid them a visit at their P-Com Network Services offices in Sterling, Va.

Carter said the detectives asked "embarrassing" questions, such as whether they'd been in the vicinity of any of the shootings.

It wasn't until the snipers gave themselves away by bragging about another murder in Alabama that police broke the case on Oct. 23.

The whole ordeal could have been over Oct. 3, when D.C. police ran the plates on Muhammad's car just hours before he or Malvo shot their sixth victim, a 72-year-old D.C. man.

But they weren't stopped, because according to D.C. Police Chief Charles Ramsey, "We were looking for a white van with white people."

But only the description of the white vehicle was based on eyewitness accounts, not the description of "white people." That was based on stock psychological profiles of mass murderers (pre-Sept. 11) and phone tips from people suspicious of white spouses, boyfriends and neighbors with guns.

Yet one witness to a Maryland shooting on Oct. 3 described two "Hispanic" men in a white vehicle. Other early witnesses ID'd "dark-skinned" men in a white vehicle. At least one woman said she saw a black man.

Those physical descriptions of the suspects were dismissed by Moose, while the physical descriptions of the vehicles were treated as gospel. In fact, Moose issued composite graphics of the mythical white truck and van.

But he refused to release a composite sketch of a suspect based on witness accounts, because he didn't want to "paint some group." Snipers were terrorizing Washington, assassinating people left and right, even a boy, and the top cop on the case was more concerned about offending a minority group than catching the killers. That's incompetence writ large and should be called by its proper name, black official or not.

And it wasn't just white vans that Moose had police look for in those dragnets. They were looking for white drivers.

In fact, police who checked cars on roads and freeways following each shooting were ordered to wave cars by if the drivers were minorities or females, according to one ATF agent. They were told to search only cars with white males behind the wheel.

Even when additional witnesses at a Home Depot shooting, separate from the one witness who lied, described suspects as being dark-skinned, Moose saw only white. In fact, he tossed their statements, implying they were colored by the bad witness. Fairfax County police had to "re-interview" their good witnesses, a spokeswoman told me, who were never heard from again.

Derek Baliles, one of Moose's officers at the Rockville, Md., headquarters, said that even if they still insisted they saw dark-skinned assailants, it would be hard to believe. He said the lights were bad in the parking garage. He even suggested they could have seen white guys in dark "make-up."

"We don't want anyone to give up on the fact that it could be a white guy," Baliles told me.

It was almost as if Moose and his investigators hoped the shootings were the work of a racist white guy – even though it defied logic, as whites were among his victims.

And the patternless shootings appeared designed only to spread terror in the nation's capital, which just a year earlier was attacked by Islamic terrorists.

FBI Special Agent Larry Foust, a task force member borrowed from the bureau's Baltimore field office, criminal division, expressed surprise when I asked him if the task force had canvassed the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Va., which is nine-tenths of a mile from the Home Depot. Astonishingly, he didn't know that one of the Washington area's largest mosques, one attended by many black Muslims, was so close to the shooting. Nor did he know that the same mosque was attended by two of the al-Qaida hijackers who slammed the jumbo jet into the Pentagon.

More, it took police three weeks to reach out to the immigrant community, even though it was clear the snipers were new to the area, having not left a local imprint with neighbors and co-workers, judging from all the bum leads, as FBI veteran I.C. Smith pointed out to me.

It was as if Sept. 11 never happened. It just had to be Timothy McVeigh's long lost cousin. Had to be.

Such tunnel vision is odd. Investigators usually adjust to facts and abandon early hunches that don't pan out.

Four times as a Portland, Ore., cop, Moose had to be disciplined for losing his temper in dust-ups with average citizens, most of them triggered by what he perceived to be racial slights by whites.

He was ordered to take an anger-management course (ironically, Moose's wife, Sandy, has taught an anger-management course at Montgomery College in Maryland). But he got into more racial confrontations.

Even at that level, he couldn't shake the chip from his shoulder. In another controversy, he had to apologize for making racial slurs against whites. Even the liberal Portland Oregonian lamented his "explosive temper."

"I tried to be very open-minded and extend myself to him on many occasions while working with him, but he made it very apparent he has some very strong bias against white males, especially ones with blonde hair and blue eyes," said a former Portland officer who served under Moose in the 1990s.

Moose has what some say is an annoying habit, as a public official, of putting his race in your face.

His corner office at police headquarters is a shrine to the black movement. Figurines of wild African elephants line a credenza. There's a plaque about black "pride." Pictures of black leaders line the walls. A poster reads: "Hatred thrives when bigotry is tolerated."

Moose came to Maryland vowing to end black criminal profiling as he had in Portland. Before taking the job in 1999, he met with the local NAACP.

When he arrived, he said he had reservations about moving to the area because he claimed the Ku Klux Klan was active there, and that it might be a "difficult" place for an interracial couple to live.

He quickly ended black profiling there – apparently only to replace it with white profiling.

A big fan of race-sensitive "community policing," Moose made Portland cops working the gang beat – during the crack wars, no less – carry blue pocketbooks filled with information about the city's social-service agencies.

As her husband started his new job as Portland police chief in 1993, Sandra Herman Moose began law school in Tacoma, Wash., commuting home on weekends.

Her best pal at law school was a North African man, according to a classmate at University of Puget Sound School of Law.

She and Moose found time a couple of years later to teach a course on "multicultural communications" at Portland Community College.

She told CNN's Connie Chung the other night that she hit the roof when she heard a female newsie call her husband "hostile" after one of his hostile press conferences.

Sandy explained that whole discrimination law is built around that word, which she claims is racially charged and should never be used to describe a black man.

So, apparently we can't say Muhammad and Malvo are "hostile," either. Will she defend them if they sue?

If Moose's blonde wife considers "hostile" to be a racial epithet, imagine what Moose considers discriminatory.

"We need to stand up as a community and attack the supply of guns," he told the citizens of Portland in 1995.

When Muhammad and Malvo were arrested, Moose said the task force got the "gun" off the street, not the sniper.

And, in an unsettling plea to the public at one press conference, he said, "You need to ask yourself: Who do you know that owns guns, and why?"

Sure enough, the ATF and other task force agencies went around confiscating guns.

Gun-rights groups in Maryland were flooded with calls from worried law-abiding residents.

"We got very interested when folks started reporting attempts to confiscate rifles for ballistic testing," said Robert D. Culver, co-chairman of Montgomery Citizens for a Safer Maryland.

"I have several reports from men who have had contacts with law-enforcement officers, some of whom rolled over and submitted their firearms," Culver told me.

Carter of Vienna, Va., says task-force detectives also came to his house on the previous Saturday morning asking to see his firearms.

"They not only wanted to see my rifles, they copied the serial numbers down, as well," he said. "And then they told me that the ATF may want to test one of my rifles for ballistics."

Carter, who complied, added: "I now wonder who retains the records of my firearms and for what purpose."

As Moose and his task force futilely chased "gun-crazed" white ghosts instead of the dark-skinned real killers, they deprived residents of Maryland and Virginia of firearms to possibly protect themselves from those killers.

"How much quicker and how many lives would have been spared in the recent sniper case if Moose had not allowed his prejudices to rule?" asked one law-enforcement veteran in the Washington area.

It's painfully obvious that Moose – a big fan of Head Start, which is fond of quoting Hillary Clinton's pal Marian Wright Edelman – is no hero. In fact, his personal prejudices may have cost several lives.

Even so, don't be surprised if his star rises. Hillary is no doubt eying Moose right now for FBI director in her administration

Ah've done been Profiled!

Ah demands reparations!!!!

I'll take it in 50's please...shall I hold my breath for MY reparations?

( Insert cricket sounds )....

[I'm not trying to make anybody feel bad. There were posts that I objected to and I see somebody else agreed, since they are gone. And yes, mocking a man because of the color of his skin is bigoted. Sorry]

Yes, I see they are gone and someone else agreed they were offensive and perhaps they were - I didn't see them.

I am not defending anyone mocking someone because of the color of their skin - although I, personally, believe there are many things worse. It is not the biggest evil of all times. It is immoral and wrong - but there are much worse things going on in this country.

I am not really sure what exactly constitutes bigotry or racism and have seen any small slight or the correct usage of a word called racism and have seen detrimental effects to this country because of it. It was a serious thing in the past - it is changing, thank goodness - but it should not be used in a cavalier way. Still calling someone a bigot and racist offends me mightily. It is not just a charge against that one person - but surely you realize the harm that has been done by people using that word to silence discourse. That is my point. It is dangerous as well as offensive. Each time it is thrown out there, it just gives a little credence to the people who use it to control thought and discussion in this country.

[Of course you can't document anything about your allegation about Chief Moose making "anti-white" statements. But you can make the accusation, can't you? However, you're more than willing to make a smear.]

I didn't smear - I repeated what other posters had said - in that I was wrong. Should have used the alleged so it would be palatable.

Let me retract everything and just say - PEOPLE WERE BEING MURDERED BY BLACK OR DARK SKINNED PEOPLE - and that police chief had (alledged, reportedly, etc.) information from witnesses that it was dark skinned or black people, but refused to 'paint a group of people'! He, however, had no trouble painting one group of people - white people. Now I don't know what his reasons were - but they were wrong and it is not all hindsight - I read the eyewitness accounts also. I cannot believe he, and others apparently, just discounted the information. And yes, it is human nature to question his reason for doing it.

Now based on the postings I have read, I question whether his actions were based on race.

If the skin color had been reversed and the white police chief had been reported to be, let's say, anti-black (however you want to put it), wouldn't you question the reason for the negligence to consider credible evidence. I would. So no, my remarks are not racist or bigotted or a smear. Just a natural progression based on all I have read and seen. IN the end that is all any of us can do.

[So...you just made an assumption. You have no proof that Chief Moose is "anti-white." However, you aren't willing to retract your statement. It's too bad you can't admit you're wrong.]

I don't think you read my post - did you? I did say I repeated what I had read on FR in postings by people who allegedly live where this man formerly worked. I did take their postings as truth - in that I was wrong.

I still question the chief, and others, in not checking out dark skinned people, contrary to eye witness accounts. Now I did couple that with what I had read on FR and 'questioned' if race could have been his reasoning.

I should have used 'alledged' the statements read on FR. I admitted that - but I still question his actions - I would. question them even if I had read nothing about him on FR .

PEOPLE WERE BEING KILLED and this chief, and apparently others, were disregarding credible evidence. There has to be a reason - what was it? Incompetence? Could be. I will question that. If I had, you probably would have attacked me saying I only questioned his competence because he was black. It is a no win situation.

But no, I wasn't wrong in questioning his actions - and I was only wrong in taking posting on FR as truth. Only those people can answer if it was truthful.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.