Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timesink
Hillary may end up the face of the New Democrat Party, but she will not resonate in flyover country.

The last time she showed up there she was smiling and laughing and clapping at Paul Wellstone's memorial pep rally, and hobknobbing happily with other corrupt Democrat dinosaurs.

The Clintons deserted Arkansas and the little guy for big city lights and power, and the little guys will eventually figure this out.

2 posted on 11/08/2002 1:35:52 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: patriciaruth
Well said.
6 posted on 11/08/2002 3:14:54 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: patriciaruth
The "face" of the Democrat party has been a morph of the Clinton's and Dasshole (the media really doesn't like photographing Gephardt--not telegenic). The pictures of Bill and Hill laughing and clapping at the Wellstone memorial like they were at a rock concert and glad the guy was dead were nails in the coffin. Furthermore, the constantly-constipated news conferences with Tom Dasshole about why he couldn't support this or that or another judicial nominee got tiresome. He was negative and whiny, not good traits when compared with photos of a healthy, masculine, energetic guy like W.

The thing that Peggy Noonan did not mention was that the Dems HAVE to move left because, contrary to what she wrote, the extremists DO have someplace they can go. They can go Independent or Green. Just as the Libertarian vote could have saved Thune, Nader halted Gore in Florida. Clinton knew that the Democrat party is like a European coalition of environmentalists (incl. anti-gun, anti-smoking), gays, teachers, NAACP, and NOW, funded by unions and trial lawyers. [The native Americans tried to get into this minority mix when they attempted to "buy" their lands back from Clinton while he was Prez.] These aren't "little guys" but organized movements with big budgets. Without this odd marriage of special interest groups, they have no real base. Every platform has to have something for everyone of them and that spells more spending, regulation, litigation, and big government. So...

The Dems DO have a message and over-taxed citizens are tired of losing their jobs to lesser-qualified "minorities" (even if you are in a minority, there is always another minority more fashionable); finding out their kids can't add; following "Simon Says" rules regarding where they can't hike, smoke, or fish; and, watching judges let criminals off, award rug-burn victims millions of dollars, and re-write the Pledge.

Mondale revealed the Democrat mission in 1984---"We're going to tax their a**es off!" That has been their mantra and raison d'etre since 1932. Unless there is a large economic base producing enough taxes to please the special interest "beggers" (or if the special interests members increase their voting populations faster than the economy grows, which could happen), they will be the minority party for awhile.

17 posted on 11/08/2002 5:52:13 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson