To: Clemenza
We'll talk about it over lunch some time :^)
Anyway, the campaign, once again, failed the white, middle- to-upper, middle-class male, whose main concern is keeping his earnings, ie. tax issues, and the campaign, as I explained in other posts, failed to elicit any kind of tax plan, i.e. capital gains cuts (short and long term), tuition tax credits, reducing airline taxes and gas taxes, lowering the marginal rate and making Bush's tax cuts permanent.
Did he ever call the Louse a LEFT WING LIBERAL?? RADICAL??? OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE NJ VOTER???? ANTI-FAMILY???? etc.
57 posted on
11/07/2002 9:32:56 PM PST by
Coleus
To: Coleus
Forrester should have run ads right after Louse was picked by McGreevey stating that Lousenberg was too "extreme" for New Jersey. The word "extremist" or "risky" tend to work well with the braindead suburban women who live in North Jersey.
Every picture I see of Lautenberg lately makes him seem like the bastard lovechild of Leslie Nielsen and Frankenstein.
64 posted on
11/07/2002 9:57:30 PM PST by
Clemenza
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson