Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas voters stick a fork in Ann Richards and her liberal pals
San Antonio Express News | 11/7/2002 | Roddy Stinson

Posted on 11/07/2002 10:24:39 AM PST by The South Texan

Roddy Stinson: Texas voters stick a fork in Ann Richards and her liberal pals

Web Posted : 11/07/2002 12:00 AM

"You can stick a fork in George Bush because he's done." — Ann Richards, speaking at a Houston rally for Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton on Oct. 28, 1992 "Stick a fork in Ann Richards and her liberal sidekicks because they are cooked." — The Texas electorate, sending a message to the Texas Democratic Party on Nov. 5, 2002

As late as 6:45 Tuesday night, Richards, a former one-term Texas governor, was telling CNN's Larry King:

"We are going to have an unprecedented turnout in Texas. ... Tony Sanchez could win. But it's harder for him than it is, say, for Ron Kirk or John Sharp, who I think will be the lieutenant governor. And Kirk Watson, who's a smart young man, the mayor of Austin, will become the attorney general."

Actually, Watson — the supereminent darling of Democratic liberals — hasn't been mayor of Austin since the fall of 2001 when he resigned his mayoral post to run for attorney general.

But that minor Richards goof pales when compared to her bold — and remarkably incorrect — last-minute prediction of a virtual sweep of the state's major elected offices by Texas Democrats.

The proof of her predictive blunder is in the numbers.

As this is edited early Wednesday evening ...

U.S. Senator

John Cornyn, 55%; Ron Kirk 43%

Governor

Rick Perry, 58%; Tony Sanchez, 40%

Lt. Governor

David Dewhurst, 52%; John Sharp, 46%

Attorney General

Greg Abbott, 57%; Kirk Watson, 41%

The magnitude of the Democratic defeat approaches breathtaking.

In 1998, in the lieutenant governor's race, Sharp, the Texas Democratic Party's brightest star, was defeated by Perry, a popular, two-term agriculture commissioner, by only 2 percentage points.

Four years later, Sharp — the Democrats' most electable candidate and the favorite politico of Texas pundits — lost by 6 percentage points to Dewhurst, a little-known and not particularly popular land commissioner, who had one campaign theme: "John Sharp is an out-of-step, tax-and-spend LIBERAL."

True or not, the "liberal" tag stuck, and that was sufficient reason for voters to knock out the Democrats' best candidate.

But Sharp's fall was a soft landing compared to the crash of Kirk Watson, the only unabashed liberal in a top position on the Democratic ticket.

Last February, Texas Monthly pundit Paul Burka predicted that during the 2002 campaign Greg Abbott would describe Watson with "just four words: liberal Austin trial lawyer" ... and Watson would counter "by trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear by asking, 'Who do you want fighting for you?'"

Texas voters provided a resounding answer to that question on Tuesday when they buried liberal Watson under a landslide of Abbott votes.

Which leads to an obvious conclusion:

Ann Richards must not have cleaned her crystal ball before palavering with Larry King Tuesday night.

Not that her way-wrong predictions will bother King or CNN's slanted-news managers.

As long as Richards is ambulatory and ready, willing and eager to put a damper on Bush Republicans, she will find a place in the lights, cameras and interview chairs of TV network big shots.

In response, Texas voters will just continue to do what they do best: watch quietly, listen politely, smile knowingly and flock to the polls to baste Miz Ann and her political pals.

To contact Roddy Stinson, call (210) 250-3155 or e-mail rstinson@express-news.net. His column appears Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays and Sundays.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: annrichards; democrats; elections; liberals; oldbag; republicans; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: Tuco-bad
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
101 posted on 11/08/2002 10:34:42 AM PST by MAWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: mikeb704
Hillary work? That's a good one!
Most likely she's got some illegal doing that for her!
102 posted on 11/08/2002 11:25:13 AM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
'You dirty rats! You're the guys...who voted out...my mutha!'
103 posted on 11/08/2002 11:29:39 AM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Illbay

104 posted on 11/08/2002 11:39:45 AM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
Thank God. I thought I was the only person alive who had seen "White Heat".

Regards, Ivan

105 posted on 11/08/2002 11:50:46 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
I promise to never make that mistake again.
106 posted on 11/08/2002 12:52:51 PM PST by Texagirl4W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xJones
I had just moved to Texas when she was running against Clayton Williams, I kind of found her entertaining at the time....she seemed like more of a mascot than a Gov.....now she is just like a gnat that keeps buzzing around....

ole hot tub annie..... HA!
107 posted on 11/08/2002 1:22:54 PM PST by Newton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
I knew she couldn't possibly have been BORN in Texas!
108 posted on 11/08/2002 2:48:24 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad; Redbob; HoustonCurmudgeon; mhking
HoustonCurmudgeon said something about two-thirds majorities being needed in the houses of the legislature to do redistricting. Is there any legal basis for such a requirement? Even if there is, the Republicans are reasonably close to two-thirds majorities in the two houses. Isn't there any way to peel off the needed Democrats to reach two-thirds by logrolling?

Remember, we're probably talking about a Republican pickup of four or five seats in the U.S. House. I also wonder whether the new day in GA might make redistricting possible. That might be a way to pick up an additional 2 House seats or so.

109 posted on 11/08/2002 3:22:29 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Chet Edwards won only 52-47. Charles Stenholm had an even closer call, 51-47. If a few Texas Dems switch parties, maybe a redistricting at this point is unnecessary.

I wonder how Texas Dem House members will react to a Nancy Pelosi leadership.

110 posted on 11/08/2002 3:35:39 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Grapefruit, baby?


111 posted on 11/08/2002 9:48:11 PM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Yep, it was born somewhere in the distant future!
112 posted on 11/08/2002 9:51:19 PM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: strela
More like a goatee! =0)
113 posted on 11/08/2002 9:53:54 PM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Texagirl4W
I promise to never make that mistake again.

Then, you are forgiven :>

114 posted on 11/08/2002 11:25:25 PM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
Are you calling Hillary Clinton a guy now? There may be hope for you yet...
115 posted on 11/19/2002 6:08:49 PM PST by WaveThatFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson