Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigg Red
But what about the rate of expansion? Wouldn't that be a sticky problem?

My knowledge is not at all vastly superior. More than anything else, I was responding to the article's assumption that you'd need/want to tansport this stuff in solid form. If you don't make that assumption, but instead assume the exact opposite, it doesn't seem to differ much from existing gas transport problems.

As for the rate of expansion, etc, that's probably a calculable property, and the bottom part of the pipe could be built with a diameter profile that accounts for it -- or you could drop a self-contained "expansion unit" down to the seabed, and run the pipe out of it.

As an example, look at this rocket engine:

That tube around the middle was used both to cool the nozzle and preheat the cryogenic propellant (LOX or hydrogen.... I can't recall which), and its diameter varies according to expansion of the stuff as it's heated, and thus maintains a constant pressure.

The basic approach would probably work for this stuff, too.

13 posted on 11/07/2002 1:49:42 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. Very enlightening.
14 posted on 11/08/2002 7:36:59 AM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson