Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Election Results
self ^ | 11-6-02 | Bones McCoy

Posted on 11/06/2002 6:35:44 AM PST by bonesmccoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-213 last
To: Inspectorette
Simon did a lot better than people anticipated. I'm already thinking about 2004 - anyone think he might have a chance against DiFi?

Boxer will be up for reelection in 2004.
Feinstein was reelected in 2000 (challenged by Tom Campbell), and her term will come up again in 2006.

201 posted on 11/07/2002 4:12:02 PM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bootless; Cool Guy
FYI
202 posted on 11/07/2002 4:18:54 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #203 Removed by Moderator

To: heleny
Wow - I guess that race was so insignificant that I'd completely forgotten about it.

Even better!!! I think the cutie (in a nerdy sort of way) Simon would be a very attractive candidate against the shrieking and strident Boxer.

204 posted on 11/07/2002 6:27:36 PM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
That's fine rainfish, stay in gloomy, rainy, wet, icy, Washington and battle your own liberals. As you have many and have your fight cut out for you, as we do here in Cal.

Good luck, and keep that umbrella handy and tire chains at the ready.

205 posted on 11/07/2002 7:22:50 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Josef Stalin
Your in Detroit aren't you?
206 posted on 11/07/2002 7:31:37 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: heleny
Whoops, I see you've posted the numbers already: 2002: .... Davis got 3,141,349, which is far less than he or Lungren got in 1998. 1998: Lungren got 3,216,749.

Amazing! Yet the RATS are claiming a mandate because they swept every statewide office by about five points.
207 posted on 11/07/2002 7:56:34 PM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: 4wurdobsrver
Si, este necessita habla espanol.
208 posted on 11/07/2002 9:05:29 PM PST by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Even if Riordan was the GOP nominee, much of Davis' war chest was already raised by March. The additional diverted cash to California was obviously not enough to make the margin comfortable. So, it seems that the Dems diverted resources to Gray Davis from funding the many house races and Senate races. One wonders what the reason is for their prioritization of Calif. politics ahead of national politics.

Someone must be scared. I wonder why.
209 posted on 11/07/2002 9:10:06 PM PST by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
1. KGO is off target. Davis runs for Prez. If he wins, Bustamante runs as incumbent in 2006.

2. LACounty- Feds are correct. No bail out is needed. LA County is sitting on 700 MILLION dollars of tobacco settlement money. Where is it?
210 posted on 11/07/2002 9:26:35 PM PST by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Exactly, a Pyhrric victory, hehe. The plan is now to watch it backfire and pick up the pieces in '06. No matter how good the national scene does I feel these socialists will find some way to screw things up.
211 posted on 11/08/2002 12:56:32 AM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Hearsay son, hearsay! =0)
212 posted on 11/08/2002 11:18:20 AM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: VetsRule
Well, let's look at this analytically using the Ben Franklin method of decision making

I was disgusted by:
A)the utter corruption of Davis
B)his hysterical response to the energy crisis,
C) the Democrat political rally that masqueraded as a memorial for Paul Wellstone

I:
A) am a fiscal conservative,
B) place a high value on morals
C) family values
D)personal honor,
E)believe in personal responsibility
F) am pro-gun
G) reserve my highest admiration for military veterans

On the other hand,

I am:
A) an agnostic,
B) believe my own view of morality is a personal choice
C)also pro-choice in the first three months and very
D)pro-science.

By my count, the score is 10 to 4 (I gave you the "pro-science" thing even though science itself cries out in favor of the existence of God).

The questioin is: What would Ben do?

213 posted on 11/09/2002 9:12:48 AM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-213 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson