Skip to comments.
Candidate: My Opponent (Allegedly) Eats Babies
ridiculopathy ^
Posted on 11/05/2002 7:36:53 AM PST by Sir Gawain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: homeschool mama; Sir Gawain
I have a great sense of humor but find NO humor in joking about eating babies. None. Zip. Nada. Zilch. See, the joke isn't about eating babies. If you read it, there isn't anything in there about the actual process of eating babies. The joke is about the extremes of political advertising. You see, the humor comes from the fact that the politicians are making up huge lies about each other that are so ridiculous that no one - except only the most blindly partisan hacks - could believe the substance. But baby eating is just a surrogate image - a "symbol" if you will - for the type of ridiculous claims made by politicians. By tapping into the over the top symbol, the humorist is drawing on symbological parallels subconsciously rationalized by our ids, egos and superegos into the psycho-pseudological confluence of shared unconscious. That's why it's really funny. I always find my jokes to be even funnier after I spend ten minutes explaining the psychological underpinnings of humor and justifying why other people should be laughing at them. Eating babies has nothing to do with it.
To: weikel
I understand it. I know what the article is trying to say. It just isn't funny. Sorry.
42
posted on
11/05/2002 8:24:06 AM PST
by
Skooz
To: A2J
O.....M.........G.....
Earth to A2J..... Come in A2J
To: jim35
Grow up.
To: Sir Gawain
Guess that goes a long way to explaining the push polls my parents are getting (they live in the district mentioned in Michigan). Gotta wonder if someone read the article, missed the satire and presumed it was true, and started push polling.
Thanks for the laugh!
45
posted on
11/05/2002 8:24:46 AM PST
by
Spyder
To: homeschool mama
Oh, so I'm a pansy for not considering dead babies as funny? You have alot to learn, Jim.
No, you are sort of funny because you are reacting emotionally to an incorrect perception of what the article is about. Sort of like being offended at words because they sound like other words even though the meaning is completely different.
46
posted on
11/05/2002 8:24:51 AM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: FateAmenableToChange
I understand what you're saying...I just don't see it as funny to elude to eating babies. Period.
To: homeschool mama
No, you're a pansy because you can't take a joke. The article is funny, satirical, and a pointed jab at politicians and their tactics. It grabs your attention. And since nobody is presently advocating eating babies, I'm pretty sure your fears are all for nothing. So you're afraid, it's for nothing, and that makes you a pansy.
48
posted on
11/05/2002 8:25:37 AM PST
by
jim35
To: Lurking2Long
To: Sir Gawain
Yet, "Poles Close in NC" gets banished to the irrelevance of chat. Go figure.
To: jim35
It's an outrageous example of how attack ads work. Perhaps, but doesn't isn't it also an example of how we have digressed as a nation to even consider such an article is "funny?"
No wonder women weren't allowed to vote for so long.
I'm a husband and a father and I find this article and your support of it disgusting.
Should I not have the right to vote as well?
51
posted on
11/05/2002 8:26:31 AM PST
by
A2J
To: Arkinsaw
52
posted on
11/05/2002 8:26:47 AM PST
by
AnnaZ
To: Skooz
LOLOLOLOL!!! Comparing this non-funny, silly, inane, wannabe-satire drivel to Swift! Now THAT'S funny!!
I'm pointing out that the baby reference is a REFERENCE to Swift because some don't understand that. That is somewhat different than comparing it to Swift qualitatively. But you know that.
53
posted on
11/05/2002 8:27:12 AM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: A2J
Veerrryy funny. No. Not to mention... ick.
54
posted on
11/05/2002 8:27:22 AM PST
by
jim35
To: Arkinsaw
Sort of like being offended at words because they sound like other words even though the meaning is completely different.Stop being so niggardly.
To: Arkinsaw
I do now. Point taken.
56
posted on
11/05/2002 8:28:24 AM PST
by
Skooz
To: FateAmenableToChange
I think it's best just to give up. They apparently think they care about babies more than we do because we can laugh at this.
To: Rebelbase
It's a strange world.
To: Arkinsaw
I do not consider it humorous to use dead babies/eating babies in satire. That is a logical response from me...and there is always emotion in the pro life response, from both men and women.
I fully realize the intent of the article. I just do not find it humorous to use babies in this way to promote an idea. Okay? :o)
To: jim35
Where did you read that I was afraid? Goodnes...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson