To: crasher
I think the Minnesota numbers are suspect- Coleman losing among men- look at this turnaround- doesn't make sense- still hope in Mn
"Mondale now leads among men (50% - 46%) when just a few days ago Coleman led led (53% - 42%).
99 posted on
11/04/2002 9:26:56 PM PST by
VAGOP
To: VAGOP
I think the Minnesota numbers are suspect- Ya, you bet ...
102 posted on
11/04/2002 9:28:28 PM PST by
11th_VA
To: VAGOP
It does seem that there is hope in MN...has anyone seen or heard any evening reports on reaction to the debate?
To: VAGOP
Sheesh...I just watched some of the MN debate on CSPAN. There is no way in h*ll any right (no pun intended) thinking person would vote for Mondale. He looked and sounded terrible.
Coleman's gonna win in Minnesota. He's much more independent than Mondale, despite Mondale's insistence that he is an independent. Yeah, right Fritz.
106 posted on
11/04/2002 9:30:10 PM PST by
Wphile
To: VAGOP
Mondale/Coleman numbers are most certainly suspect. Theres a good chance that the indepenent vote will go to Coleman considering how much bad press the Wellstone funeral got.
To: VAGOP
It's total bs.
Our GOP and independent state numbers show Norm gaining across the board.
It all depends on getting out the vote.
I've been on the ground here since this morning's debate doing some coordination and it looks REAL GOOD IF WE GET OUT THE VOTE - 50% chance of rain/snow mix, high of 40.
This IS the critical race and we need Minnesotans motivated, voting and seeing to it that everyone asks 3 people to go with them.
To: VAGOP
That's just proof that all demographic breakdowns are worthless in a poll with a sample of this size.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson