Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
What do you make of these numbers? They look great to me. But then again, I don't believe them. Some of his changes are far too dramatic.
92 posted on 11/04/2002 9:24:31 PM PST by crasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: crasher
I think the Minnesota numbers are suspect- Coleman losing among men- look at this turnaround- doesn't make sense- still hope in Mn

"Mondale now leads among men (50% - 46%) when just a few days ago Coleman led led (53% - 42%).
99 posted on 11/04/2002 9:26:56 PM PST by VAGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: crasher
Not much. There are a lot of tight races. CO, MO, MN, GA, TX, NH, and SD. Anyone who has a fairly high degree of confidence who will win any of these is lying, particularly MN. Subset numbers are highly suspect. They are best ignored. But Zog is right on one thing. At this point, most of the margin of error is associated with guessing relative turnout.
129 posted on 11/04/2002 9:35:21 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: crasher
The trend everywhere is GOP gaining, gaining, gaining in all but AR. The dems are trying the BIG LIE bs to suppress the vote! I'm telling you, I ran a successful GOP campaign during the '94 revolution and the REAL NUMBERS are scaring the living CR@P out of the DNC!
134 posted on 11/04/2002 9:36:23 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson