Correcting Conservatives

http://www.badeagle.com/cgi-bin/ib3/cgi-bin/ikonboard.cgi?s=388fdbc435e867683b90cde8be2d774a;act=ST;f=15;t=95 ^ | Oct.21,02 | Dr. David A. Yeagley

[ChadGore]

WIN ONE FOR THE GIPPER

Vote on Tuesday.

Do the right thing.

[n2002duke]

Conservatives are intellectuals, not emotionalists.

Don't know about the choice of words here. "Intellectual" is an epithet reserved for left-wing ivory-tower academics whose most salient feature is a dearth of understanding of how the real world operates.

[mrsmith]

"White people don't need to produce more. "

You ought to read my Bible. It says to be fruitful and multiply.

Obviously any group can reproduce more if it is more fruitful.

[FreeLibertarian]

This is going to be another "More Conservative Than Thou" thread.

[Cicero]

I'll pass.

[foreverfree]

bump

[Asclepius]

Poor dark masses need to produce less.

An "intellectual", you called yourself?

[petuniasevan]

Welcome to the Forum.

If debate is what you want, you'll be sure to find it here!

:>)

[R W Reactionairy]

" I believe in preserving races, at least my own, no matter what that implies about immigration, integration, and intermarriage.

An opposing view: When everyone is a some mixture perhap a nice chocolate brown, race will cease to be an issue. Until then blacks, whites, asians and even citizens of Mongo will be cursed with the of Jesse Jackson, and David Duke Black Panthers and the Aryan Brotherhood. To hell with the lot of them.

[Mensch]

Conservatives should never hesitate to correct one another when we find misinformation and error among us.

"Misinformation and error" are hallmarks of the left, you stand corrected.

[WFTR]

I agree with most of your commentary. My biggest disagreement is with the idea that interracial marriage is a bad thing. While I think most people will always continue to marry more or less within their own race, I don't see a problem with those who choose to mix. Furthermore, the American nation is really about ideas and not just a narrow English or Scottish racial background. There is no reason that people of other racial backgrounds cannot fully adopt our ideas and be fully a part of Americanism and the conservative movement.

WFTR
Bill

[Mensch]

By the way, what rational does an intellectual use for preserving race?

[n2002duke]

I believe in preserving races, at least my own, no matter what that implies about immigration, integration, and intermarriage.

White people don't need to produce more. Poor dark masses need to produce less.

I don't like the territory this guy is wandering into.

In the time I've been here this forum has prided itself on intelligent and honest discourse -- the kind you'll never find in liberal circles -- about immigration and racial issues, but this guy might be crossing the line.

We don't need any racists, white supremacists or other similar types here.

[Maelstrom]

Racism is most often a Leftist failing.

There is no race, only humans. Let's extend a conservative culture to the failings seen from the Left and welcome our brethren with open arms.

I suspect even the original poster's upset is with what is popularly seen as black culture, not necessarily the blacks themselves. That culture can be spread beyond it's race, as is evidenced in some inner city whites.

Blame the culture, and extend the Christian hand of Freedom as represented in Traditional American culture.

[BattleFlag]

You may wish to learn a little more about Dr. Yeagley before forming an opinion about his intentions re: racial issues.

http://www.badeagle.com/html/biography.html

Its interesting that the statement;

"I believe in preserving races, at least my own, no matter what that implies about immigration, integration, and intermarriage."

...apparently only takes on racist overtones if it is percieved to be made by a caucasian.

Dr. Yeagley is anything but a racist and most certainly anything but a white supremacist.

[Bad Eagle]

Thank you for your understanding, BattleFlag. I knew this was a bit of a heavy article, but I want to find out more about Free Republic, and who participates, etc. I get the sense there are closed minded and open minded, like anywhere else. I am a little surprise that people object to love of their own race. These sound quite like Ward Connerly, and David Horowitz, in fact. Race is bad. To be a memeber of a race is an archaic concept, they feel.

I believe God created races for a reason. And if one does not believe in God, then evolution, or Nature, created races for a reason. What are the human reasons for consciously obliterating all race? This sounds more totalitarian than anything I've ever known of in history.

[Teacher317]

Obviously any group can reproduce more if it is more fruitful.

If I read this statement correctly, I think I disagree with your reasoning. Let's run wild with stereotypes for a moment: Affluent white America makes the conscious choice to limit family size. Poor non-whites make the conscious choice to have more children than they can afford. The Leftists in government summarily take the resources of the affluent to subsudize the poor. Therefore, the less fruitful group reproduces more, without any of the usual, natural consequences of such decision-making. Meanwhile, the affluent, who were already limiting family size based on economic considerations, will further limit their reproductivity based on the same criteria, since they now have even less resources thanks to those Leftists confiscating their wealth.

[Bad Eagle]

Who is "we"? What do you mean, "prided itself," and I suppose I could say, What do you mean by "intelligent?" I'm sincere in these questions. You may know Free Republic better than I, but, you sound a inolerant. Perhaps you distinguish between "discourse," and discussion. The former means everyone thinks the same, and expresses himself with free-wheeling confidence. Discussion means, I think, confrontation of different views, and the development of understanding through exchange. Maybe I'm wrong about that...

[Bad Eagle]

On the contrary, I thought that observation was a no-brainer. You're being willing to discuss it, that is being intellectual.