Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chnsmok; Cicero; mykdsmom; billhilly; nicmarlo; hellinahandcart; ChadGore; GaltMeister; Republic; ..
Can I get some FReeper volunteers to write letters to Hannity and Colmes suggesting that since Alan Colmes, ignorant of the facts (as usual) skewered our poll watcher that it would be only fair and balanced to give her side of the story equal time?

In case you missed the UPDATE, see post #626. Here are the email addresses of Hannity and Colmes. For email addresses of other news programs, see kcvl's post #101. We really need to make the effort to stop Rat fraud in its tracks before the next election, and there is always the possibility that they will be worse than ever. We have a shot NOW. Let's not blow it!

Hannity & Colmes
Sean Hannity
Hannity@foxnews.com

Hannity & Colmes
Alan Colmes
Colmes@foxnews.com

"Stop_the_rats" takes a break from policing the courthouse to express her sentiments of Clinton at the XXX42 FReep.

She kinda looks like our own FReeper "Man "Woman in Black" doesn't she?

680 posted on 11/10/2002 10:30:51 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]


To: Revolting cat!
Oops! I think I had you name wrong in the ping list for this thread. Anyway, see updates at posts #579, 626 and 680.
681 posted on 11/10/2002 10:44:12 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty; Sean Hannity; Matt Drudge; Rush Limbaugh; kayak; ForGod'sSake; Patriot1; blam; ...
MAJOR PING/UPDATE

Please see update post #626 and several others following regarding NAACP going after FReeper poll watcher ("stop_the_rats)......potential lawsuits......McAuliffe made calls and is possibly involved...DEVELOPING.....

p.s.: Sorry if you've been double-pinged. (Please let me know via FReepmail if you are not interested in updates. Thanks)

682 posted on 11/10/2002 10:45:34 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty
Do you have a link or post reference to what Colmes said?
683 posted on 11/10/2002 10:50:04 AM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty
Can I get some FReeper volunteers to write letters to Hannity and Colmes

Excellent idea. And thanks for the addresses. Your chapter has lit a fire and showed us a real, live problem. Now we all need to go HOG WILD and spread this information around to the right commentators and others who can help.

708 posted on 11/10/2002 12:46:30 PM PST by okimhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty
Thanks for the addies, sweetliberty. Here's the email I just sent to Sean Hannity (will follow with similar emails to Alan Colmes and Brit Hume.)

Dear Sean:

The other day Alan Colmes, ignorant of the facts once again, criticized a Republican poll watcher in Arkansas for “intimidation” of blacks. Knowing the source of this story (the lying Democrats), Alan should have known better than to report this incident without finding out what really happened. Apparently he doesn’t know that a poll watcher in Arkansas is supposed to challenge poll workers when they don’t request IDs from voters. And if a potential voter presents an out-of-state drivers license, this is a valid reason for a poll watcher to challenge the ballot. And when voters enter the polls with campaign stickers, buttons, political t-shirts, etc., which are not allowed inside polling placers, a poll watcher is merely doing his or her duty in taking photographs of these illegal actions. These legitimate actions by a poll watcher are exactly what Alan Colmes has erroneously called “initimidation.” This outrageous assertion is certainly not fair and balanced reporting.

The fact is that it was not the voters, but the poll watcher who was being intimidated. NAACP operatives and other Democrats attempted to keep her from fulfilling her responsibilities, and she was forced to leave, while being subjected to an NAACP mob shouting and chanting at her. She then went to Jay Dickey’s office and told them what had happened, and two of the people there escorted her back over to the courthouse. From that point on, the people in charge generally made her job as difficult as they could and even called the sheriff to get her to leave. However, he allowed this courageous poll worker to go back in, after verifying with other officials that she did indeed have the right to be there and to do the things she was doing.

Such intimidation of poll watchers is outrageous and should not be permitted. Voter fraud by Democrats is rampant and is the most serious problem with our election system. It is essential to have poll watchers to monitor voting in order to have any chance to identify illegal voting at the polls. However, Democrats don’t want poll watchers interfering with their illegal voting, so they falsely cry “intimidation.” Then liberals like Alan Colmes are more than happy to take up the cause and be dupes for the Democrats, so that voter fraud can continue abated. This is outrageous, and Alan Colmes should be ashamed of himself.

Sean, we implore you to tell the other side of this false "intimidation" story. We are counting on good guys such as you to tell everyone what really happened.

Margie Seemann

719 posted on 11/10/2002 1:31:58 PM PST by newslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty
E-mail sent.
932 posted on 11/15/2002 5:55:33 AM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson