Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*Mondale doesn't show at debate* [WHERE'S WALTER?]
The Washington Times ^ | 2 November 2002 | Donald Lambro

Posted on 11/02/2002 3:36:30 AM PST by matrix

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:58:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

ST. PAUL, Minn.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: election; minnesota; mondale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: Carry_Okie
BTW, in case you don't remember, that theme is largely what George W. Bush ran on.............
101 posted on 11/02/2002 12:42:56 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Both Wellstone and Mondale are to the left of Coleman. I don't ever see Mondale being able to wear the "RINO" tag.

Ronald Reagan was a Democrat.

102 posted on 11/02/2002 12:46:59 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Ronald Reagan was a Democrat.

And some of the legislation he signed attests to that.

103 posted on 11/02/2002 12:53:54 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: memaw
Mondale was the one who said Reagan was too old (Reagan was same age Mondale is now), and made the same claims about one of his opponents running for the senate. He also said he was too old when he announced he wouldn't run again. So he's either a liar or he's too old.
104 posted on 11/02/2002 12:58:40 PM PST by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
And your point is? America should have re-elected Jimmy Carter? Or in the nomination in 1980 should have gone to George Bush or Bob Dole?

Better choices in some elections would be good but you've got to deal with the realities at hand.

105 posted on 11/02/2002 1:05:18 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: weegee
And your point is?

My point is that there isn't alot of difference between democrats and republicans. In fact under the worst President, Clinton, spending increased less in 8 years than it already has in 2 years under Bush.

106 posted on 11/02/2002 1:11:59 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone


Thanks for posting that pic. I loved that skit.
107 posted on 11/02/2002 1:19:31 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Bush hasn't been president 2 years yet. That'll happen in 3 months. How long did he have a Republican congress? Who spends? How fiscally solvent was Clinton's economy? When the house of cards collapses it costs money to rebuild the damned thing.
108 posted on 11/02/2002 1:31:43 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: weegee
How long did he have a Republican congress?

Better yet...has he ever heard of a veto pen?

109 posted on 11/02/2002 1:38:50 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
In other words, it won't make a difference if Coleman or Mondale is elected.

I heard that Coleman is pro-life. If true, it would make a big difference to many voters.

110 posted on 11/02/2002 2:08:21 PM PST by Honey West
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Honey West
If true, it would make a big difference to many voters.

Legislatively?

111 posted on 11/02/2002 2:15:59 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox
Forgot one.....Had to change his diaper.
112 posted on 11/02/2002 2:18:45 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Re: radio. Being a little on the downhill side Mondale probably forgot where the debate was abd showed up for Prairie Home Companion instead.
113 posted on 11/02/2002 2:24:53 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You don't think it makes a difference to the voters?
114 posted on 11/02/2002 2:27:20 PM PST by Honey West
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Senators can support conservative judges. You stated there was no difference between Mondale and Coleman. That's not true. Coleman is pro-life, while Mondale is pro-abortion.

115 posted on 11/02/2002 2:35:32 PM PST by Honey West
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Honey West
Senators can support conservative judges.

Alert me when this happens.

116 posted on 11/02/2002 3:16:49 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Senators can support whomever they wish. I didn't say they could change the Supreme Court decision. But you knew that.

Let me remind you of your original statement.

"In other words, it won't make a difference if Coleman or Mondale is elected."

Pure BS. Coleman is pro-life, one example, Mondale isn't. On any matter before the Senate regarding abortion, or abortion funding, Coleman would not vote the same as Mondale would. Are you saying they would?
117 posted on 11/02/2002 7:38:26 PM PST by Honey West
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Honey West
Coleman would not vote the same as Mondale would.

We'll see. Bush said he was pro-constitution and a conservative. He has proven that he was lying several times over.

118 posted on 11/02/2002 7:49:02 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson