Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLurker
Notice their list of errors is prefaced with "including", that means there could be other errors not on the list.

No matter how you slice it there's tons of apparent duplicate entries and none of your explanations provide a remotely logical explanation. No reasonable person can think that DCM imported 3120 programmer/analyst/terrorist/sex slaves (if it wasn't for the terrorist part that could be a great company to work QA in... come on a little bit of levity, this situation is far too intense) under the cover of H1B visas. There's got to be something wrong with the data. It's jsut that simple, all your rantings can't change it. I've said numerous times the bad data could be DOL's fault. And golly your boys ALSO say there's the distinct possibility of bad data coming from DOL.

So I say there's bad data.
The guys providing the data say there's a good chance of bad data.
And yet you insist that I'm wrong.

Do you wear a red plastic nose?
262 posted on 11/06/2002 2:45:24 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
In post 261 and 250 you were shown that it is standard practice to submit LCA applications with the same start date and job title. IF you can't follow the logic, it is your lack of intelligence that is the issue, not the data.

No matter how you spin it, the number of application records submitted by a company is not an issue. I had said many times that if there are data errors, they are errors present in the DOL database and were not added or "massaged" by anyone at zazona.com. The owners of zazona.com HAVE described the known errors, and if there are duplicates, it is not their fault, as you had in fact earlier alleged.

IF you REALLY desire the truth in this, why don't you email the Department of Labor and ask THEM about the possibility of duplicate records. I DID find that the number of your so-called duplicates was directly related to the fact that MANY if not ALL of the foreign owned companies apparently had these "duplicates". As we had seen later on, the ONE US company that had these so-called "duplicates" had such a sequence as to demonstrate that it is normal for companies to submit multiple applications with the same start date and job title.

Now can you PLEASE just find another thread to haunt?

263 posted on 11/06/2002 3:10:15 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson