You say I said something I didn't say. Just because I didn't jump when you wanted me to doesn't mean anything other than I didn't feel like jumping. YOU are the one being dishonest here if you are TRULY trying to say otherwise. Did I say, gee, I think you are seeing duplicates because you're using the database incorrectly? I didn't say that, but I suppose you COULD take it that way if you're prone to jumping to conclusions, which you obviously are...
If you're just going to play DU games of creative editing and outright LIES go do that crap over there where it belongs.
Ah, now the true colors shine through. You're just another shill. Just like so many others before you, when all else fails and there is no defensible position, you resort to DU smears and insults. Surprisingly, you haven't started throwing out the anti-American liberal smears yet, is that coming up next? Perhaps a little sprinkling of "tinfoil" comments? It's a rather old trick, and there are MANY examples of it here on FR...
If there are any lies being thrown about here, they are coming from YOUR keyboard. Take your meds and have a nice day.
It doesn't make sense for these to be unique applications, they are 100% identical across the board. I think whatever method they're using to cull out this information is duplicating entries, there are too many of the 100% identical duplicates for any other explanation. If it was one or two companies I could write it off as bad paperwork habits, but every search I do in any city going for any time frame gives me at least 1 of these per page. That's gotta be a bad data procedure on their part. Also if you hilight text you'll find there are invisible characters all over the place, when you include that these become unique entires, I think they have something to do with why these dups are showing up. Now I'm a nice guy so I'll assume sloppy code not deliberate falsification of data, but either way the site isn't presenting an accurate picture.
Not ONCE in there do I mention dead companies. That's the post you were replying to when you said I wasn't using it right. Clearly you were saying the DUPLICATES, which was the ENTIRE subject of the post, were the result of user error. If you're such a bald faced LIAR that you'll now claim you were referring to an entirely different subject do us all a favor and get the hell off FR. We don't need LIARS around here, and until you can admit the TRUTH you are a LIAR across the boaard 100% nothing you say should EVER be believed by ANYONE.
Liar.