Posted on 11/01/2002 9:54:26 AM PST by mrustow
You take Farrakhan's statement at face value, but misrepresent Horowitz and Taylor, in order to try and discredit their statements? Boy, are you obvious, D. Try learning some subtlety before you make a fool of yourself again.
My take, also.
While Taylor seemed (almost giddy?) dredging-up garbage from our nation's (relatively) distant past?
Howowitz addressed America's present; &, without indicting America's past.
Horowitz's take is positive, refreshing, invigorating, & holds a promise for tomorrow.
Incidentally, holding David's Jewishness against him, or saying his POV is tainted, corrupted because of it?
An easy accusation to make, for sure; but, nonetheless is patently absurd.
David Horowitz is one of America's finest patriots -- bar none -- and, curiously not because he knows, "why."
But because I know, David knows, "why not."
I live for right now, in the present; so, what David had to say is of more importance, is more relevent to me.
Well, moreso than hearing what kind of assholes our nation's founding fathers & ancestors allegedly were, at any rate.
Be that as it may, there're still a number of collosal (& lesser wannabe) assholes knockin' around.
Perhaps some compassionate conservative might consider cueing-in Taylor to that fact?
He wouldn't have to root-around so hard in the past for the cultural dirt to work into his writings, he seems to rely on so heavily?
Above everything else, though?
David Horowitz simply *sounds* -- to me -- mentally healthier, grounded more in reality than the gifter writer, Jared Taylor.
I'm not just saying [that] because I'm a member & supporter of the CSPC, either.
I sincerely believe it.
...I even slept on it before responding; just, to be sure.
I thought so, too.
That's why I *pinged* ya over to it.
Seems it paralled the others day's discussion quite nicely; &, from a completely different perspective.
"Thank you for sharing."
Don't mention it.
It's all about learning, now.
...isn't it? ;^)
psssssst?
Before ya can, "Play the room"?
Ya gotta first look at who's *in* "The Room," eh? ;^)
Thanks for an interesting article, though.
...was responsible for inspiring an interesting & informative discussion, mr.
I haven't read much about Horowitz and Taylor, in order to determine what they believe; I've read a lot by them. If you'd read Horowitz, you'd know that talk of racialism in his case is totally wrongheaded. If you'd read Taylor, you'd know that his research findings are not subordinated to his racialist beliefs.
Script -- what script would that be? Most "conservatives," e.g., the Bush brothers, shy away from race, and constantly surrender to black racists.
Deny evidence of white racism, insist that black racism is apparent.
Provide the evidence of white racism -- if you can. As for black racism, I have enough evidence -- including personal experience -- to fill many books. The problem is, the newspaper business and publishing are both dominated by socialists who'd rather publish fraudulent claims of white racism, rather than thoroughly documented proof of black racism.
Thing is, you can get angry about the charge all yu want, but I am not the first person to say it, won't be the last, and for some reason, they can't seem to shake it.
The repetition of a fraudulent charge has nothing to do with the truth of the charge. Black race hoaxers repeat every one of their phony charges ad infinitum, ad nauseam. According to your rhetoric, I'd have to concede that Tawana Brawley really was raped by white policemen, that ebonics really is an African language genetically passed on among American blacks, that black Floridians really were disenfranchised by racist Republicans in 2000, and that the "Central Park Five" really were innocent of almost murdering the Central Park Jogger in 1989. Similarly, if repetition equaled trruth -- something the Red Guard used to say -- then a Jewish conspiracy really is running the world.
I also know that if I had something written by Leonard Jeffries on my site, even though I don't support him, I would be called out here.
You couldn't have anything by Leonard Jeffries on your site, because Jeffries has never written anything for publication. To my knowledge, all that he ever wrote, was an unpublished doctoral dissertation on the politics of the Ivory Coast, and a pathetic, 1989 report for New York State Education Commissioner Thomas Sobol on education from an Afrocentric perspective. I read the latter, which was such an embarrassment, that the NYS Department of Education didn't even want to give me a copy. It was on a par with the sort of stuff Alfred Rosenberg used to write. To speak of Jeffries in the same tone as Jared Taylor, just shows your ignorance of both men.
Why thank you.
Mr. Jenkins...
Just exactly what are your politics, anyway?
...care to share that with the forum?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.