Skip to comments.
Antigun scholar Michael Bellesiles gets the boot.
The Wall Street Journal ^
| November 1, 2002
| KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL
Posted on 11/01/2002 7:00:14 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:04:58 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
In March 2000, 47 law professors and historians sent a stiff letter to Charlton Heston, president of the National Rifle Association. They told him "the Second Amendment permits broad and intensive regulation of firearms" and urged him to move beyond such trifles as constitutional guarantees to "the real issue"--just how much regulation is needed to "prevent the killings and violence that plague our country today."
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: banglist
To: Stand Watch Listen
BTTT
2
posted on
11/01/2002 7:14:11 AM PST
by
EdReform
To: Stand Watch Listen
Maybe they can all sign another letter, this time condemning the "NRA's nightmare" not the NRA. Yes and pigs will fly and the Democrats will condemn Clinton as a rapist."Not gonna happen" One more reason to ignore academia.
3
posted on
11/01/2002 7:14:52 AM PST
by
Timocrat
To: Stand Watch Listen
Another leftie lying to support the cause. SOP. At least this jerk got caught.
4
posted on
11/01/2002 7:17:59 AM PST
by
jrp
To: jrp
Memo to Mike Zuckerman at U of Penn:
Your credibility was just recalled.
To: Stand Watch Listen
Does this mean that this poor excuse for a book now will reside in the Fiction Section?
6
posted on
11/01/2002 7:28:14 AM PST
by
Puppage
To: Puppage
NO.
It'll be on the re-write desk at the New York Times.
To: *bang_list
To: Stand Watch Listen
Yet another would sit on the committee that gave Mr. Bellesiles the prestigious Bancroft Prize.They should take that back that prize and give it to Jimmy Carter
9
posted on
11/01/2002 8:14:18 AM PST
by
scouse
To: Stand Watch Listen
If being wrong on the facts about
anything actually mattered to leftists, they wouldn't be leftists.
Bellesiles will always draw a fat check from somewhere, regardless of his obvious fraud. Half the nation cares little, if at all, for the truth anymore. It's all about political positions. I'd like to think Bellesiles' exposure as a fraud (or John Lott's research) would change minds, but the chances of that actually happening are slim to none.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
No, Bellesiles' book will still be on the shelves, still be on the required reading lists, because it fits the liberal "scholars'" view of how the world should be. They don't let reality intrude overmuch into their worlds, and they'll certainly never go out of their ways to inform their students.
Think B's Bancroft Prize will be revoked?
Maybe, but not very likely.
As far as Emory is concerned, Bellesiles' only sin was getting caught!
11
posted on
11/01/2002 2:38:02 PM PST
by
Redbob
To: Redbob
I think you're on to something.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson