Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Infidelity 'is in the genes'
BBC News ^ | Wednesday, 30 October, 2002, 00:38 GMT | Staff (Professor Robert Winston)

Posted on 11/01/2002 5:42:36 AM PST by shrinkermd

Women with steady partners may still be tempted to sleep around - but mainly on certain days of the month, say researchers.

A BBC documentary to be broadcast on Wednesday explains how human sexual instincts are so strong that some women's preferences may alter significantly while they are ovulating.

While her partner might be a better bet to bring up children and support her, another man might carry genes which mean healthier, stronger children.

Morgan Wise, a train driver from Big Spring in Texas, found this out when his youngest son was found to have cystic fibrosis, a devastating lung disorder caused by a single faulty gene.

Morgan Wise found he had fathered none of his sons

Both mother and father must carry the gene to produce a cystic fibrosis child, and Morgan duly went for a gene test to confirm he was a carrier.

The test proved negative - effectively proving that he was not the child's father.

He told the BBC: "The doctor said: 'You are not a carrier of cystic fibrosis.' I couldn't believe it."

There was worse to come. Subsequent DNA tests revealed that not one of Morgan's three sons was fathered by him.

One in 10

However, researchers suggest that this is by no means an isolated event.

One study suggested that one in 10 children are being raised by men who are unaware that they are not the father.

A more "masculine" face - better during fertile period

A study at the University of Stirling seems to pinpoint the instinct which might tempt some women to stray around the time of the month they are fertile.

Two groups of female volunteers were picked.

One was tested during their ovulation, the other at another point in her cycle.

Each was shown a computer image of a male face which they could adjust electronically to make appear more or less masculine, using features such as the thickness of the neck and the squareness of the jaw.

While the group not ovulating tended to prefer their men with slightly more feminine feature, at the point of ovulating, the women strongly preferred their men masculine.

This, say scientists, is down to instinct - while more feminine features might signify a man with less testosterone who is more likely to prove a steady partner, the stronger features they preferred at ovulation might indicate a better set of genes, producing a stronger or healthier child.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10rule; genes; infidelity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
Part of the New Age Morality is that there is an explanation for every human foible and no one is responsible for anything.
1 posted on 11/01/2002 5:42:36 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: shrinkermd
One study suggested that one in 10 children are being raised by men who are unaware that they are not the father.

Just one more reason for me to seek a pre-nuptial agreement.
3 posted on 11/01/2002 5:46:38 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
...the stronger features they preferred at ovulation...

This helps explain certain feminists groups attraction to Janet Reno.

4 posted on 11/01/2002 5:51:04 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear
Seems to me womens sex drive may be a bit stronger around closing time
5 posted on 11/01/2002 5:51:36 AM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Part of the New Age Morality is that there is an explanation for every human foible and no one is responsible for anything.

That's quite a leap. I suggest that you stay out of tall buildings.

6 posted on 11/01/2002 5:54:30 AM PST by Reelect President Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
One study suggested that one in 10 children are being raised by men who are unaware that they are not the father.

I can hardly believe that. Sounds like so much more Barbra Streisand.

Also sounds like another peer-review avoidance, run stright to the media play.

7 posted on 11/01/2002 5:54:49 AM PST by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
BS..... I really really doubt the 1 in 10 childen.

This just attempts to make women look immoral and not worth trusting, and excusing those who are cheaters. Kinda like the man needs to spread his seed deal with male cheaters.

Personally I always wanted the masculine man for all areas, not just baby making, but for child raising, bread maker, lover, spouse.



8 posted on 11/01/2002 5:56:35 AM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear

LOL, not mine that was when I least wanted it, well after my first child it was.... then I avoided it like the plague.
9 posted on 11/01/2002 5:59:47 AM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
While her partner might be a better bet to bring up children and support her, another man might carry genes which mean healthier, stronger children.

Then the example how the woman picked a father with cystic fibrosis.

?

10 posted on 11/01/2002 6:06:03 AM PST by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
More excuses for bad behavior. The title of this article should be "Infidelity is in the 'jeans'".
11 posted on 11/01/2002 6:10:53 AM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird
I really really doubt the 1 in 10 childen.

That does seem rather unbelieveable, doesn't it? However, this is not a figure plucked out of thin air -- there was an actual study done in the UK and America in which children's paternity was DNA tested and comparable figures (~ 10%) were found. And, it was not done to support some lame academic thesis, but in actual fact, shocked and stunned the investigators. I've forgotten where I read about it, but I think it was in the book Sperm Wars by Robin Baker.

12 posted on 11/01/2002 6:13:32 AM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Also one of the reasons that infants tend to most strongly resemble their fathers shortly after birth - to allay fathers' apparently well-founded suspicions on this count.
13 posted on 11/01/2002 6:14:47 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
Cystic fibrosis is a recessive trait. Both mother and father must be carriers. Carriers typically appear perfectly healthy.

Recessive traits persist in the gene pool because carrier status confers a survival advantage. Carriers of sickle cell anemia are more resistant to malaria than non-carriers. Carriers of Tay-Sachs more resistant to tuberculosis and carriers of cystic fibrosis more resistant to typhoid.

14 posted on 11/01/2002 6:15:34 AM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pete

15 posted on 11/01/2002 6:15:53 AM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
A few observations:
The husband was a traindriver.
Maybe, not to excuse the philandering wife, she was lonely.

Obviously, if one were to credit the instinct for more masculinity at time of ovulation, to ensure stronger, healthier children, this woman's animal psyche was on the blink, as she produced at least one less than normally healthy child.

Connecting the dots can be so confusing :o
16 posted on 11/01/2002 6:16:07 AM PST by HangWithMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Ah yes, my genes made me do it.

I am powerless in the face of my genes. I am Pavlov's dog and Darwin's moth.... my destiny is already written and all I can do is hold onto the gunwales and shoot through life's rapids.

Choice holds no power for me; it is a mirage, a cosmic joke, a pitiful delusion.

I am not a rock, I am a chemical puppet.

Such garbage.

17 posted on 11/01/2002 6:38:47 AM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I always though that part of the purpose of civilization, marriage and faith was so that we could rise above our physical (animal/genetic) nature. In a civilized society, some genetic proclivities should be struggled against and censured. Instead, in modern America, we say "Oh, my genes make me act this way, so it's no big deal."
18 posted on 11/01/2002 6:48:44 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Couldn't have said it better myself.
19 posted on 11/01/2002 7:00:43 AM PST by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
One study suggested that one in 10 children are being raised by men who are unaware that they are not the father.

LOL!

Any single man like myself who has had the experience of being propositioned by married women knows this to be true. Though Chris Rock said it about men, it is true that both men and women are as faithful as their options.

Now, this might not be the case among Conservative Freepers, but in the world at large, women are sleeping around as much as men are, if not more.

As a larger percentage men in American society become feminized slaves to women with agendas, rather then true leaders, I expect it will only get worse.

Who in their right mind would get married today? LOL

20 posted on 11/01/2002 7:03:33 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson