Posted on 11/01/2002 5:25:32 AM PST by Mia T
Awesome post. Thanks for the obvious work for truth.
|
|
|
POSTSCRIPT:
The Washington Times---Inside Politics |
|
Had George Will written Sleaze, the sequel (the "sequel" is, of course, hillary) after 9-11-01, I suspect that he would have had to forgo the above conceit, as the doubt expressed in the setup phrase was, from that day forward, no longer operational. Indeed, assessing the clinton presidency an abject failure is not inconsistent with commentary coming from the left, most recently the LA Times: "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize." When the clintons left office, I predicted that the country would eventually learn--sadly, the hard way--that this depraved, self-absorbed and inept pair had placed America (and the world) in mortal danger. But I was thinking years, not months. It is very significant that hillary clinton didn't deny clinton culpability for the terrorism. (Meet the Press, 12-09-01), notwithstanding tired tactics (if you can't pass the buck, spread the blame) and chronic "KnowNothing Victim Clinton" self-exclusion. If leftist pandering keeps the disenfranchized down in perpetuity, clinton pandering,("it's the economy, stupid"), kept the middle and upper classes wilfully ignorant for eight years. And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton covertly cooked the books even as he assiduously avoided essential actions that would have negatively impacted the economy--the ultimate source of his continued power--actions like, say, going after the terrorists. It is critically important that hillary clinton fail in her grasp for power; read Peggy Noonan's little book, 'The Case Against Hillary Clinton' and Barbara Olson's two books; it is critical that the West de-clintonize, but that will be automatic once it is understood that the clintons risked civilization itself in order to gain and retain power. It shouldn't take books, however, to see that a leader is a dangerous, self-absorbed sicko. People should be able to figure that out for themselves. The electorate must be taught to think, to reason. It must be able to spot spin, especially in this age of the electronic demagogue. I am not hopeful. As Bertrand Russell noted, "Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so. "
|
|
KNOWNOTHING VICTIMS RODHAM/CLINTON REVISITED Q ERTY2 "There isn't a shred of evidence." HILLARY, YOU KNOW, KnowNothing Victim Q ERTY4 double bagel reckless rodham-clinton-gore reinvention-of-government schemata W I D E B O D Y. low-center-of-gravity Dim Bulb, Congenital Bottom Feeder clinton zipper vitiated by obvious spilth Q ERTY6 utter failure IT IS OBVIOUS 4th-Estate Malfeasance (DEATH BY MISREPORT) rodham-clinton reality-check BUMP!
|
|
This misreporting actually endangers people's lives. By selectively reporting the news...
|
|
"I think the rock is still there, but I'm not sure," Helen quipped. Her punch line to clinton's response to her question about a -- (only in Helen's mind) 'fantasy' -- clinton kleptocracy, was in fact 4th-estate CYA-ing disguised as a joke. Ironically, unbeknownst to the always clueless Helen, the one-liner she was delivering was indeed a joke; it was the butt of the joke that was her misreport...
|
|
alpractice and/or malfeasance by "compartmentalization" redux... It appears that The New York Times doesn't learn from its mistakes. Will it take the Times another 50 years to understand/admit that by having endorsed for reelection a "documentably dysfunctional" president with "delusions" -- its own words -- it must bear sizeable blame for the 9-11 horror and its aftermath ? (Note, by the way, the irony of Sulzberger's carefully worded rationalization of the clinton endorsements, pointing to clinton "policies," not achievements, (perhaps understanding, at last, that clinton "achievements" -- when legal -- were more illusory than real--perhaps understanding, at last, that the Times' Faustian bargain was not such a good deal after all).).
|
|
AMERICAN MUSEUM--ER--MUSLIM COUNCIL KNOWNOTHING VICTIMS RODHAM/CLINTON REVISITED
Q ERTY2 "There isn't a shred of evidence."
HILLARY, YOU KNOW, KnowNothing Victim Q ERTY4 double bagel,
W I D E B O D Y. low-center-of-gravity Dim Bulb, Congenital Bottom Feeder
Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS
4th-Estate Malfeasance (DEATH BY MISREPORT)
rodham-clinton reality-check BUMP!
|
Ugh ...all that Halloween candy is about to reappear!
We must turn the tables on Nov. 5th! Send little Tommy Daschle to his room!
Pray that Algore keeps running in 2004 and HRC is sedated and duck-tapped.
It's the best of times, and the worst of times. ;^D
5.56mm
Eleanor, at a White House Conference, sometime in the 1990'2.
BTW, the co-rapist can plainly see that Mitt Romney is an extremely attractive 2008 presidential candidate with immense crossover appeal. That is why this mutant couldn't contain herself; she raced to Beacon Hill to defeat him at speeds seeming to defy the laws of physics; there she spilled standard issue, unbecoming, faux-feminist, clinton demagogic bile that effectively depredates and rapes all women. Q ERTY3 zipper-hoisted PING!
|
BTW, the co-rapist can plainly see that Mitt Romney is an extremely attractive 2008 presidential candidate with immense crossover appeal. That is why this mutant couldn't contain herself; she raced to Beacon Hill to defeat him at speeds seeming to defy the laws of physics; there she spilled standard issue, unbecoming, faux-feminist, clinton demagogic bile that effectively depredates and rapes all women. Q ERTY3 zipper-hoisted PING!
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.