Posted on 10/31/2002 7:53:18 PM PST by lyonesse
Britain and the US have "lost the right" to lecture New Delhi on how to respond to terrorist provocation by displaying double standards by tracking down bombers in Pakistan but letting them operate freely in Kashmir, India's foreign minister said yesterday. In an interview with the Guardian, Yashwant Sinha warned that relations between Pakistan and India remained tense despite the withdrawal of hundreds of thousands of troops from their shared 1,800-mile border. "There is a tremendous anger in the minds of the people of India," he said. "They are angry even with us. They feel we have taken a very soft line with Pakistan."
India has been smarting from what it perceives as the west's softly-softly approach towards Pakistan, which the government claims was behind the attack on the country's parliament last year and a recent upsurge in violence during elections in the Muslim-majority state of Kashmir. The two nuclear-armed countries have edged towards war twice in the past year.
Mr Sinha indicated that India will block any attempt to lift sanctions against Pakistan today when an eight-country Commonwealth committee meets in London. The sanctions, imposed after a military coup brought General Pervez Musharraf to power in 1999, limit aid and bar Islamabad's officials from attending Commonwealth meetings.
Commonwealth sources said the mood of the committee had swung towards the stance of Australia and India, its most hawkish members.
Mr Sinha accused Pakistan of sabotaging economic cooperation in South Asia and voiced doubts that India would attend a summit of seven regional leaders scheduled for January in Islamabad. "What is it the summit will do? On the weighty issues like trade there is a lack of will from Pakistan to make any progress," he said.
New Delhi has been furious that the west has not taken a harder line with President Musharraf, who pledged to crack down on militants crossing into Indian Kashmir before the elections in the state earlier this month.
Mr Sinha said 800 people were killed in terrorist violence during the election campaign, including candidates and a state minister.
"Terrorism in Kashmir is entirely imported and exported by Pakistan," he said. "The international community calls Pakistan a stalwart ally, so the terrorists in Pakistan are bad and the terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir are good.
"If the international community want to live with this definition then good luck to the international community. But it is the same al-Qaida fellow who comes into Jammu and Kashmir, who goes to Bali, who goes Singapore, who goes to the US and who comes to Europe."
It was the responsibility of countries such as the US and Britain to force Pakistan to act, he said. If they could not, then India would respond "without restraint".
"The international community has lost its right to advise India," he said. "The international community came and told us this is the promise President Musharraf has made [to curb infiltration into India by Islamic militants]. Yet Musharraf has clearly failed to deliver."
New Delhi also claims that the recent elections in Pakistan are evidence that President Musharraf is merely consolidating his hold on power, rather than moving from "dictatorship to democracy".
The EU described the elections as "seriously flawed", after its observers reported that polling officials had rigged the process to favour pro-Musharraf candidates.
Mr Sinha said that instead of promoting a "vibrant democracy" in Pakistan, Britain and other countries preferred to look the other way.
"You have to trust the will of the people. People have the right to govern and misgovern themselves," he said. "The stability of Pakistan should not be confused with the stability and preservation of President Musharraf in power."
If they want to hurt Pakistan, they should insist that it be part of the Commonwealth, the biggest organization of socialist loser weenies on the planet.
So you think India should have told the United States and Great Britain to take a flying leap? Both the United States and Britain pressured and advised India that they should not attack Pakistan for fear of upsetting the war on terror being waged in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, even though Pakistan undoubtedly deserves the most severe of ass whuppings. I think it was incredibly brave and an amazing expression of solidarity with both the U.S. and Britain, for India to show such restraint and control under the circumstances. I have more respect for the Indian people as well as more trust in them as to their intentions to become an even greater and substantial ally with the West against militant Islamic Fundamentalism and Chinese Communism.
The Indians are pissed cause the State Dept sold them the Brooklyn bridge. I would bet that they've gotten wiser. I see a blanket warning to Pakistan (and its supporters) to stop the terrorism. The next time they are provoked; instead of a full fleged mobilization they will probably undertake smaller, surgical strikes against the Pakis. Maybe even go to the Israeli model of retaliation strikes against Pakistani targets of value.
"Pakistan's President Gen. Pervez Musharraf and his wife Sehba Musharraf, left, perform Umra, an Islamic ritual, Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2002 in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Musharraf met high officials and members of the royal family during his two-day visit. " AP
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.