Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/29/2002 1:57:47 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
They could investigate the show, Dumn and DumNer.

"My parakeet Peety died. His head fell off. He was very old."

..."Our pets' heads are falling off!"...

If they really want to convince us it's not terror related, they should try to sell it to the blind kid.

2 posted on 10/29/2002 2:09:19 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
the agency probably won't decide the probable cause of the crash until next year.

So then this is a nonreport report?

3 posted on 10/29/2002 2:10:54 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I wonder if the govt. has arrested anyone for trying to get a piece of the tail to do an independant test for explosives like they did to the one that went down over L.I?Also, why does the govt. refuse to turn over the surveilance videos of the Oklahoma city area just prior to the bombing there. What don't they in govt. want us to know?
4 posted on 10/29/2002 2:41:05 AM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
So this plane is save to fly as long as the pilot doesn't move the rudder back and forth.

Can't wait for the final report.

IMO every one should have a redesigned tail installed.
Not to mention the computer control system that produces a large rudder swing to a small input.

Thanks for the post.

5 posted on 10/29/2002 3:06:16 AM PST by Recluse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
...involves many complex technical questions that can be boiled down to a simple query: What caused the tail to snap off?

The NTSB should review the passenger manifest. They'd probably find that someone named Mohammed was sitting near the back of the plane.

6 posted on 10/29/2002 3:51:21 AM PST by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Allen
ping
8 posted on 10/29/2002 3:57:05 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
OK. The tail fell off because it was plastic.

Now could they please tell me why both engines fell off?
9 posted on 10/29/2002 3:57:22 AM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The tail came off because the plane was never designed to fly sideways. The plane "lurched to the left", when the right wing lost it's structural integrity (like dipping one oar in the water). The side wind forces sheared the tail off cleanly.

The right wing failed because a shoe bomber detonated just above the right wing.

10 posted on 10/29/2002 3:58:08 AM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Flight 587 probe focusing on what made tail fall off .

I'm going out on a limb and saying the reason the tail fell off was caused by the 1st shoe bomber igniting his bomb before passengers could stop him.

12 posted on 10/29/2002 4:11:05 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson