Replies

In all likelihood, the Bush Administration has sufficient evidence right now to make a case against Saddam and involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing. But to reveal what they already know would most probably also be a scathing indictment of the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001", not merely of incompetence, but of some active enabling of the means to deliver the bomb to the location where it was detonated. And that the Bush Administration will not do. They are leaving this to be determined by historians studying documents that had been kept from public view, a hundred years from now. Even today, we cannot find out what was in many of the documents connected with the Kennedy assassination, which happened almost 39 years ago.

Perhaps you are correct. IF this is the case, dubya needs to be seriously smacked around. I do believe that x42 was into some pretty evil sh!t and having it covered up by dubya is inexcusable. We would not even KNOW about these links if Jayna Davis and our (former) Patrick Briley had not kept on top of things over the years. They are to be as commended as the two involved administrations are to be condemned...

would most probably also be a scathing indictment of the regime of the "Former Occupant ..."
Uh-uh, careful, don't upset the apple cart. Can't start precedents sticking it to the former executive. No, no, must maintain the illusion of stability.

I expect a dark corner data dump to "move on" beyond this explosive news probably during the throes of the Iraq war. Consider also what is dug up in Iraq later will probably overwhelm this news as well.

And that the Bush Administration will not do

If we were only implicating a former president, then there might be justification in not airing his dirty laundry. Unfortunately, this ex-presidents wife is now a US Senator stating she 'wont run for President'. Considering that many of her followers assumed she was really running the Presidency while the black painted President was getting his knob polished, allowing him to go free from traitorous acts may lead this country to further peril. Especially since Hillary may use her (now a factoid) fascist goon squad to win a presidential election. Remember what we could be dealing with if Hillary is elected president, (Reno using Gestapo tactics to forceably kidnap and deliver a free child to a communist dictator).

But to reveal what they already know would most probably also be a scathing indictment of the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001", not merely of incompetence, but of some active enabling of the means to deliver the bomb to the location where it was detonated. And that the Bush Administration will not do.

If you are correct, then the Bush administration is engaged in covering up corruption and is corrupt itself by a coverup of that importance....that's not just about bribes or campaign money, after all, but of murder.

And that the Bush Administration will not do. They are leaving this to be determined by historians studying documents that had been kept from public view, a hundred years from now. Even today, we cannot find out what was in many of the documents connected with the Kennedy assassination, which happened almost 39 years ago.

Yeah, and in a new book, the author reports and shows how Carter and Tip O'Neill begged the Soviets for help in 1980 in defeating Reagan! He got most of his info from KGB files! This stuff comes out eventually.

Democrats are pure scum!

Ah yes...the "KENNEDY ASSASINATION 39 YEARS AGO".

IN "Kill Zone" the best of the Kennedy assasination books (unlike others that mostly detailed how he was killed) is detailed WHO killed Kennedy.

George the elder was over some black ops CIA team that coordinated the different elements of the coup. The only reason George Jr. is president is to protect all the good ole boys. After you're president you know everything so Clinton is untouchable.

Don't get me wrong; I support Dubya, he is by far the lesser of two evils and I can hardly blame him for protecting his daddy.