Skip to comments.
Gaffney: Saddam Possibly Tied to Oklahoma City
Fox News ^
| Wednesday, October 23, 2002
| Frank Gaffney, Jr.
Posted on 10/23/2002 1:50:14 PM PDT by flamefront
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Amid speculation that President Bush is reconsidering what will constitute "regime change in Iraq," one thing should be clear: Saddam Hussein's willingness to "change" his attitude towards permitting the resumption of intrusive on-site U.N. weapons inspections will not, in fact, eliminate the danger posed by him and his ruling clique.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: murrah; okcbombing; oklahoma; saddam; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
What is news is that, according to the Evening Standard, the Bush Justice Department has apparently, finally begun to take a serious interest in Ms. Davis' evidence.
The London Evening Standard is posted on FreeRepublic here.
To: glorygirl; mtrott; AtticusX; honway; thinden; Matt Drudge; Fred Mertz; backhoe; RJCogburn
News - "the Bush Justice Department has apparently, finally begun to take a serious interest in Ms. Davis' evidence."
To: flamefront
Thats ridiculous. Everyone knows that John Doe #2 was Andreis Strassmeier. ;^)
To: flamefront
One thing you can bet the Slickster and his DOJ wanted ALOL the blame on right wing militia types ONLY
4
posted on
10/23/2002 1:59:58 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: flamefront; Neil E. Wright
IF this is proven, it would be plenty to go to war on, IMHO. Much sounder than Bush's statements so far. However, it appears that dubya is COMMITTED to war, no matter what and may be looking into this as cover for what he intends all along. Which is quite scary....
5
posted on
10/23/2002 2:01:22 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: flamefront
Nice that Fox is running with the ball a bit. It will be interesting to see if the other networks do.
To: flamefront; backhoe; flicker; goodell70
Jayna Davis Bump.
7
posted on
10/23/2002 2:03:24 PM PDT
by
sultan88
To: dcwusmc
However, it appears that dubya is COMMITTED to war, no matter what Baloney.
To: Republican Wildcat
Has anyone refuted her theories yet? I'd like to know that info so I can intelligently debate it with people who don't buy this.
To: Republican Wildcat
Could you perhaps specify WHY? Your present three syllables are essentially as valuless as other of your defenses of dubya.
10
posted on
10/23/2002 2:06:09 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: Prodigal Son
Nice that Fox is running with the ball a bit. It will be interesting to see if the other networks do. It's an interesting angle, but I am pretty skeptical. Everyone looked for a muslim terrorist before turning to the militia angle - one of our own.
To: Julliardsux
I haven't seen any refutations of her information myself.
To: dcwusmc
The burden of proof is on you. You made the charge.
It doesn't really matter. You and I both know that isn't true. Your only motivation is to attack the President for whatever bizarre reasons you have.
To: dcwusmc
In all likelihood, the Bush Administration has sufficient evidence right now to make a case against Saddam and involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing. But to reveal what they already know would most probably also be a scathing indictment of the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001", not merely of incompetence, but of some active enabling of the means to deliver the bomb to the location where it was detonated. And that the Bush Administration will not do. They are leaving this to be determined by historians studying documents that had been kept from public view, a hundred years from now. Even today, we cannot find out what was in many of the documents connected with the Kennedy assassination, which happened almost 39 years ago.
To: sultan88
To: flamefront
Shut down the borders and kick out all non-Westernized immigrants now. Way too many---probably the great majority---of these jokers want to kill us or steal our jobs, property, and country.
16
posted on
10/23/2002 2:12:04 PM PDT
by
uscit
To: flamefront; honway
thanx for the heads up.
17
posted on
10/23/2002 2:13:12 PM PDT
by
thinden
To: Republican Wildcat
I made an opinionated comment. You chose to call it baloney without backing it up with an informed refutation. Your mindless defense of the indefensible is what I have come to expect from you. Your party loyalty obscures what SHOULD be your loyalty to the Constitution and the United States. Pity.
18
posted on
10/23/2002 2:13:36 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: alloysteel
Perhaps you are correct. IF this is the case, dubya needs to be seriously smacked around. I do believe that x42 was into some pretty evil sh!t and having it covered up by dubya is inexcusable. We would not even KNOW about these links if Jayna Davis and our (former) Patrick Briley had not kept on top of things over the years. They are to be as commended as the two involved administrations are to be condemned...
19
posted on
10/23/2002 2:17:43 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: alloysteel
would most probably also be a scathing indictment of the regime of the "Former Occupant ..." Uh-uh, careful, don't upset the apple cart. Can't start precedents sticking it to the former executive. No, no, must maintain the illusion of stability.
I expect a dark corner data dump to "move on" beyond this explosive news probably during the throes of the Iraq war. Consider also what is dug up in Iraq later will probably overwhelm this news as well.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson