Posted on 10/23/2002 1:50:14 PM PDT by flamefront
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Amid speculation that President Bush is reconsidering what will constitute "regime change in Iraq," one thing should be clear: Saddam Hussein's willingness to "change" his attitude towards permitting the resumption of intrusive on-site U.N. weapons inspections will not, in fact, eliminate the danger posed by him and his ruling clique.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Thanks for the serious bump.
If we were only implicating a former president, then there might be justification in not airing his dirty laundry. Unfortunately, this ex-presidents wife is now a US Senator stating she 'wont run for President'. Considering that many of her followers assumed she was really running the Presidency while the black painted President was getting his knob polished, allowing him to go free from traitorous acts may lead this country to further peril. Especially since Hillary may use her (now a factoid) fascist goon squad to win a presidential election. Remember what we could be dealing with if Hillary is elected president, (Reno using Gestapo tactics to forceably kidnap and deliver a free child to a communist dictator).
Yeah, the thing is with me- I was stationed overseas while all this was going on, preparing to be deployed. I never got to follow the story that closely. I never came back to the States and after leaving the Army, rarely encountered Americans. So whenever I hear people discussing the various theories, conspiracy angles, John Does- I find it intriguing, but don't know what to make of it. I have no clue if there's anything to the various theories or not. For me it would be interesting to see this explored while I'm paying attention and while a Republican is President- just to see what comes out of it. I feel like I was lost in a time warp while all this happened.
My one question I always have- Why doesn't Terry Nichols ever mention any Middle Eastern connection in exchange for a plea bargain or just for plain old media coverage? It seems like now with the war on terror and since 9/11, if he had info like that people would be really interested in hearing it and it would be pretty relevent I'd say.
Ach... Questions, questions. They'll never be answered. I'm a 'Lee Harvey Oswald did it alone' man myself, but IF...
Cut-outs.
Cut-outs give Saddam's fellators in the U.S. Senate cover.
If you are correct, then the Bush administration is engaged in covering up corruption and is corrupt itself by a coverup of that importance....that's not just about bribes or campaign money, after all, but of murder.
You can use my Vice-Gripstm. FReepmail me.
Who are your friends?
This is b.s. The Bush Administration has been well aware of what happened re: the OKC bombing at least since March, when Danny Defenbaugh was unceremoniously dumped from his job, along with the rest of the FBI officials involved in the OKC Bombing.
I am told the Philadelphia Inquirer is planning to run a story Sunday upending Jayna's facts, and that former FBI officials will be quoted.
I suggest a general flame. It has to take place tomorrow, since the weekend papers have early deadlines.
No cuss words, just serious concern, together with lots and lots and lots of links.
Sign your real name, and tell them where you live, and why you are worried about this and cannot accept anymore government/media hogwash,and how the rest of the country won't either, given the current situation in regard to terrorism.
Tell them they will have blood on their hands if they don't take the time to check their facts and simply take the word of government officials without further investigation.
Tell them they first and foremost have a responsibility to tell the truth, and that, no matter what the editors may think of Arlen Specter, he is still a U.S. Senator and should be scrutinized as such, not as a lunatic of sorts, despite the single bullet, despite Ira Einhorn, etc. etc.etc.
Again, he has managed to get re-elected to the Senate for more than 20 years, so that must count for something.
Do it. Write.
Even if it's only two sentences, it will count for something. There is strength in numbers, when it comes to the media.
Also --if there's anybody on the ping list or out there in cyberland (and I know there is, without anyone telling me anything) who has details to share about this but has not shared them with the rest of us, please consider calling the Philadelphia Inquirer and telling them, and furnishing them with whatever evidence you can.Remember that is a media organization, not a government organization (yet) and they sometimes are willing to list people as unidentified sources.
Inquirer Main Switchboard
215-854-2000
EMAIL ADDRESS FOR THE INQUIRER'S EDITORS:
(So a real person in charge will read your letters)
Editor Chris Hepp
chepp@phillynews.com
Editor Deirdre Childress
dchildress@phillynews.com
Assistant City Editor Francisco Delgado
fdelgado@phillynews.com
Assistant City Editor Conrad Grove
cgrove@phillynews.com
Send it to all of them, and more if you like.
No, OKCSubmariner bump.
But he is banned.
If you see this article here. kindly flag me, in case I miss it- I'll be happy to write them and deluge them with links.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.