Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/23/2002 12:20:29 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
"The sniper's bizarre demand for $10 million may not be a genuine bid to fill his pockets - just another way to torment cops, an expert said."

I AGREE!

2 posted on 10/23/2002 12:34:45 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
If money was the motive, the demand would have come a lot sooner.
4 posted on 10/23/2002 1:03:26 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
It's a trick. The sniper is a jihadist of one sort or another.
5 posted on 10/23/2002 1:18:03 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The sniper's bizarre demand for $10 million may not be a genuine bid to fill his pockets - just another way to torment cops, an expert said.

I agree. He's just amusing himself by making them jump through flaming circus hoops and making fools out of themselves.

It doesn't matter,though. The damage has already been done,and was done when that idiot Moose publically stated he was trying to pay the ransom. Look for copycats to be coming to your area soon. Anytime you are willing to pay big bucks to get something,you will end up getting more of it.

6 posted on 10/23/2002 3:41:40 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I agree with his conclusion but not his reasoning. I believe the ransom demand is a secondary objective if not a diversion altogether, because it makes no sense to me that the sniper would wait until he had 10 (or 11?) successful shootings/escapes before he made his initial ransom demand. Those arguing he had to prove his bona fides as a dangerous man have been watching too much TV.
7 posted on 10/23/2002 7:15:18 AM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I am wondering that IF the sniper(s) does want money, that perhaps police are making a mistake by trying to "talk" to the sniper. If it is an extortion effort, the best answer might be "We are not paying you anything ever and we are going to hunt you down. End of discussion not to be reconsidered."

Otherwise, you are encouraging the person(s) involved to commit more killings to drive the negotiations, which is what the sniper claims is happening. I realize that by engaging the sniper the police are hoping to get clues and to prevent killings. But IF this is any kind of cold blooded extortion then negotiation is a mistake.

This assumes paying a ransom is not an option. I can't imagine giving the sniper money to operate with.

12 posted on 10/23/2002 7:26:23 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The same TYPICAL tactic used by procrastinators who need an excuse to carry on with their dirty deeds...that way establish in their sick mind the REASON for commiting more crimes and blaming the other side. Typical tactic seen lately by Saddam and Arafat....delay delay delay and come up with excuses as to WHY they had to kill a bunch of folks...
14 posted on 10/23/2002 7:30:12 AM PDT by antivenom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; JohnHuang2
Has anyone suggested this:

Chief Moose announces a press conference, comes before the microphone, and reads the following statement:

"10 million dollars you want? Well, we have 10 million, but it isn't for you. It is for anyone who turns you in leading to your trial and conviction. Your mother, father, sister, brother, neighbor, friend, wife, girlfriend, etc. 10 million tax free to the person responsible for your arrrest and conviction."

19 posted on 10/23/2002 1:11:44 PM PDT by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson