I find it interesting that in the 2000 elections, a guy who had died was voted in.. and the Dems said they didn't have enough time to place a shoe-in for him. (They had almost six months.)
Yet, in New Jersey, Toricelli gets nabbed for his crimes and the Dems push the "Laut" on the state with three months to go to the elections. And say that there's nothing wrong.
Now, if six months isn't enough time to replace a dead candidate in one state, then three months isn't enough time to replace a politically dead candidate in another state.
Anyone else see that as well? (Dem vote fraud seems to be a big ticket item this year. And in every state in the union as well.)
It's whatever is in the RATs' advantage. If it's giving a few bums some smokes, so be it. If it's having a bunch of students make the grand tour of the voting places, so be it. If it's keeping a dead guy on the ballot, so be it. If it's a last-second replacement of a politically-toasted guy, so be it. If it's keeping the polls open until it's known just how many votes need to be manufactured, so be it. If it's counting, and counting, and counting, and counting, and counting, and counting, and counting, and counting, each time manufacturing a few more RAT votes, until the RAT wins, so be it. If it's giving a few trinkets to a bunch of dullards (I know, politically-incorrect, but much faster to type), so be it.
Indeed, the New DemonRAT party views each and every one of these illegalities as something to be done again and again, even if it's not necessary.