Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US scents political shift in Latin America
FT.com ^ | Oct 22 2002 | Richard Lapper

Posted on 10/22/2002 5:29:56 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Even by its own standards, Latin American electoral politics has been throwing up some surprises of late. Lucio Gutierrez, a retired leftwing soldier who led a coup two and a half years ago, won the first round of presidential elections in Ecuador on Sunday.

Next Sunday, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the former lathe operator and rabble-rousing trades unionist, known as "Lula", is poised to win Brazil's presidential elections in a landslide. Earlier this year Evo Morales, a peasant farmer who represents the growers of coca leaf, narrowly missed the Bolivian presidency.

"You couldn't make this stuff up," says Michael Shifter, director of the Washington-based Inter-American Dialogue. "Garcia Marquez [the Colombian novelist associated with the genre of magic realism] has been outdone by it."

For some rightwing US commentators, these are also dangerous developments in a region regarded by Washington as its own backyard. Constantine Menges, a former official in the Reagan administration, says these developments are tantamount to the extension of a new "axis of evil" that already includes Fidel Castro's Cuba and Hugo Chávez's Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela.

Brazil's history as a nuclear energy power is particularly worrying, they say. "Combine Brazilian nukes with Venezuelan petrodollars and Cuban subversion, and Washington policymakers will suffer migraines for years," said Deroy Murdock in a column published in the Washington Times, the rightwing daily.

Mr Menges and others make much of the ideological connections that link Mr da Silva's Workers' party (PT) with Mr Castro, Mr Chávez, and the leftwing Farc guerrillas of Colombia. Mr da Silva was a co-founder of the São Paulo Forum, a leftwing discussion group, for example.

"Lula's a supporter of terrorism," Mr Menges said recently. "He will, I believe, permit covert support to be given to bring about anti-American regimes in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru."

The parallels between Mr Chávez and Ecuador's Mr Gutierrez will provide more grist for that mill. Like the Venezuelan leader, Mr Gutierrez is a late convert to electoral politics and a sworn enemy of "neo-liberalism". His January 21 Patriotic Society is named after the date he forced Jamil Mahuad, former president, out of office in 2000 by storming congress with indigenous supporters.

But these ideological views take little account of the enormous differences that separate Latin America's leftwing movements. Many of the links are tenuous. Those involving the PT take little account of its move to the centre ground of Brazilian politics - a factor in the rising fortunes of Mr da Silva, who a few months ago was given only an outside chance of victory. Leftwing members of his party are appalled by by electoral alliances with the centre-right Liberal and other parties. Heloisa Helena, a senator opposed to the party leadership, said many "people are talking about leaving the PT and forming a new party".

In Venezuela, Mr Chávez, for all his confrontational rhetoric, has shied away from the nationalisation and socialist planning introduced by Mr Castro in Cuba in the 1960s. Economic decline - Venezuela's economy will contract by more than 6 per cent this year - has resulted from incompetence and inefficiency rather than ideology. Mr Shifter says Mr Chávez "is running the country into the ground but it is not because he knows what he is doing".

Similarly, US commentators also underestimate the extent to which support for the left is part of a broader rejection of established politicians and the perceived failures of market-friendly reforms. Declining growth, mounting unemployment and an alarming crime wave - linked in part to the illegal drugs trade - are undermining faith in representative politics in the region.

In many countries politics has become fragmented and traditional politicians linked in the public mind with corruption. In some cases established leftwingers like such as Mr da Silva are benefiting from what Mr Shifter describes as an "axis of upheaval".

In others, outsiders like such as Mr Gutierrez and Mr Morales are drawing support from traditionally excluded indigenous groups. In Argentina, Luis Zamora, a Trotskyist whose "throw them all out" slogan is aimed at all "establishment" politicians, attracts high support in opinion polls.

But the mood of disaffection can as easily benefit the right. Earlier this year Colombians elected Alvaro Uribe, a hardliner who promised to step up the war on leftwing guerrillas. Mr Uribe was backed by neither of the country's traditional parties, the first time this had happened in Colombia's recent history.

In Ecuador, Mr Gutierrez faces a second round run-off next month against Alvaro Noboa, a wealthy businessman and something of a political maverick. "When countries are sickened by poverty they sometimes allow themselves to be swept up by populism," says Rodrigo Borja, one of the defeated candidates.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; castro; chavez; dasilva; farc; gutierrez; latinamericalist; marxism; saopauloforum; southamerica; uribe

A New Axis of Evil

The Southern Threat


Jesse Jackson compares Brazil candidate to Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela

Colombia's Struggle and Its Enemies


1 posted on 10/22/2002 5:29:57 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Cross-link:

Castro, the Carribean, and Terrorism

2 posted on 10/22/2002 5:32:58 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Beware the Looming Threat From the South

Lula: Is He Going To Have Brazil Go For Broke

Marxist-Inspired Cuban-Venezuelan-Brazilian Axis Could Create Massive Problems For U.S.

3 posted on 10/22/2002 5:40:34 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
It's dangerous. I don't know what it is about Latin America, but they seem incapable of governing themselves. Everything goes to extremes. For two hundred years virtually every country in Central and South America has swung between right-wing tyrants and left-wing tyrants, with short-lived periods of unstable and corrupt democracy.

Joseph Conrad got it right a hundred years ago in his greatest novel, "Nostromo."
4 posted on 10/22/2002 5:54:11 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Gutierrez in Ecuador is a Chavist, rather literally. The coup against Mahuad was encouraged by Chavez, and the officers involved were paid a stipend by Chavez after they were cashiered from the army.

Alvaro Noboa, the other candidate is considered more pro-business than Gutierrez, but that is not very inspiring. He is also a populist, who in his last attempt at the presidency ran ads in the paper promising a new house to any voter who wanted on (just fill out this form and send it in). He is close personal friends with a former president who was impeached for being mentally unstable, who openly robbed millions from the national till (and boasted about it on camera). Noboa has promised to pardon him and bring him home from exile.

So our choice is Noboa, the banana tycoon, who is pretty openly corrupt, or Gutierrez, who is Chavist, a military populist. If Noboa wins, he will be such a disaster that people will beg for the Chavists to take over. So, we are probably better off for Gutierrez to win now and go from there.

The indigenous organizations are very political and very active. They all have political advisors who are European leftists. The people themselves are populists, poor people who just want the government to pay attention to them. But their leaders and advisors have bigger game in mind, and have their sights set on power at whatever cost. They are allied with the environmental groups, who are determined to stop any effort at private industrial investment. The country is bankrupt, the only hope is to free up the economy, but any kind of private investment is met with determined opposition by a combination of indigenous and enviro groups. Their tactics include demostrations and strikes that stop projects, sealing off highways, and filing lawsuits in US and EU courts, again, to stop projects in Ecuador. And demonstrating in Europe against EU banks that finance the projects. Astonishing in a country that is dying for want of investment and employment.
5 posted on 10/22/2002 6:04:10 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
barf......


6 posted on 10/22/2002 6:17:39 PM PDT by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
After that read...the whole "Nukem all and let God sort'em out" argument sounds pretty good here.
7 posted on 10/22/2002 6:22:24 PM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Latin_America_List
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
8 posted on 10/22/2002 6:52:51 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Anybody seen any of the congressional results for Ecuador? I saw them for the two largest provinces, Guayas and Pichincha, but none of the others. In those two, the Social Christian Party, which is conservative, appears to have won 18 seats, the Democratic Left, which is a center-left party, 14, and nobody else won any. Those two parties held the presidency of Ecuador from 1984-1992, and things were pretty stable. So maybe congress will be able to check Guttierez somewhat.
9 posted on 10/22/2002 7:09:28 PM PDT by Rensselaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsNetwork
Bump for tomorrow.
10 posted on 10/22/2002 9:01:15 PM PDT by ConservativeNewsNetwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
How long before FARC or some other leftist goons gain control of the canal that the Clintonistas and Carter gave away? They'll have this whole hemisphere by the balls....the legacy continues.
11 posted on 10/22/2002 9:47:06 PM PDT by Frances_Marion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
JFK really screwed up by not knocking Castro off in '62.

But we really should have knocked him off as soon as he declared himself a Communist, before the Soviets got so entenched.

The chickens are coming home to roost 40 years later, and we may be paying for that mistake (Castro) for another 40 years or more.

What really galls me is that the dumbass politicians who made all the mistakes re: Castro and Cuba will not suffer the consequences of their actions -- most of them are dead.

The Communization of South America is a problem the current crop of Foggy Bottom guys 'n gals better understand and deal with a hellofalot better than they dealt with Cuba. I do not have much hope that they will, though.
12 posted on 10/22/2002 10:01:14 PM PDT by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
***In Venezuela, Mr Chávez, for all his confrontational rhetoric, has shied away from the nationalisation and socialist planning introduced by Mr Castro in Cuba in the 1960s. Economic decline - Venezuela's economy will contract by more than 6 per cent this year - has resulted from incompetence and inefficiency rather than ideology. Mr Shifter says Mr Chávez "is running the country into the ground but it is not because he knows what he is doing".***

The Southern Situation

13 posted on 10/23/2002 1:32:38 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I don't know what it is about Latin America, but they seem incapable of governing themselves.

It's the lack of a large middle class. You either get the elites ruling or the peons ruling and either is a disaster.

14 posted on 10/23/2002 5:54:33 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
One wonders about the United States' commitment to open borders to trade within the hemisphere by 2005, (Free Trade Area of the Americas). Are these really the kind of governments with whom we would want to enter such an arrangement?
15 posted on 07/09/2003 6:15:52 AM PDT by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson