[Garak]

You want to specifically set aside the Constitution to go after Muslims because of this white male between the ages of 21 and 35 is running around shooting people?

[Rubasoo]

"You want to specifically set aside the Constitution to go after Muslims because of this white male between the ages of 21 and 35 is running around shooting people?"

Since when do we know this cretin is definitely white or even definitely male??

Setting aside the Constitution is another thing entirely. But I don't remember the Red-Coats possibly having weapons which could kill more then dozens at a time. Times change...

[DWSUWF]

"...You want to specifically set aside the Constitution to go after Muslims because of this white male between the ages of 21 and 35 is running around shooting people?..."

Precisely what part of the Constitution is 'set aside' by any of my suggestions? Be specific.

Are you referring to 'Interning' native born moslems who've issued anti-American threats?

You're right. That's too charitable of me by half.

I hereby amend that to: Indict, try and throw the sentencing guideline book at them.

Feel better?

And BTW, if you have personal knowledge that the sniper is a "...white male between the ages of 21 and 35..." and are not providing the source of that knowledge to the police, you may be chargeable as an accessory after the fact to murder.

Of course, if it's just your BS opinion, then there's no harm, no foul.

[Myrddin]

You want to specifically set aside the Constitution to go after Muslims because of this white male between the ages of 21 and 35 is running around shooting people?

You have absolutely no evidence to support the race, gender or age of the shooter. Until you do, quit spewing your prejudiced comments. The ONLY consistent evidence is the matching ballistic profiles of the recovered projectiles from each of the victims.

The appropriate punishment for this sniper is to be turned loose 800 yards downrange at Camp Perry with a signal orange ballcap.