[DoughtyOne]

I'll be honest here. I am somewhat surprised that the insurance company didn't declare this an act of war and refuse to pay off. It would also seem that there would have been a terrorism clause, or a willful act clause that would have absolved the insurance company. This having not been the case, I do think the building owner is entitled to claim two incidents of loss, one for each building.

[The Red Zone]

It would also seem that there would have been a terrorism clause, or a willful act clause that would have absolved the insurance company

Willful act? The building owners have no apparent role in this, unless you have a Manhattan size tin foil hat.