[Catspaw]

So he met his staffer at a social occasion and not in his office where she was employed? When do you think those little love sparks started? While Hutchinson was married or after the divorce to his last wife was finalized?

Hutchinson is an adulterer. If he doesn't like being called that, he can sue me.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

So he met his staffer at a social occasion and not in his office where she was employed? When do you think those little love sparks started? While Hutchinson was married or after the divorce to his last wife was finalized? Hutchinson is an adulterer. If he doesn't like being called that, he can sue me.

Temper, temper, may be time that you join conservative in those anger managment classes.

[conservative_2001]

"So he met his staffer at a social occasion and not in his office where she was employed?"

Actually she was one of his high staffers, not that it much matters. They were friends.

"When do you think those little love sparks started? While Hutchinson was married or after the divorce to his last wife was finalized?"

Is this your "evidence" of adultery? That's sad. They were friends, then later fell in love after the divorce. If you have evidence to the contrary, let's see it.

Have you ever heard 'Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor'? It's one of the 10 Commandments.

Those accusing Hutchinson of adultery are committing a greater sin than anything Senator Hutchinson has done. Isn't that ironic? The moral stand anyone thinks they're making by voting against Hutchinson pales in comparison to the sin they've committed by accusing Hutchinson of adultery.

"Hutchinson is an adulterer. If he doesn't like being called that, he can sue me."

It's not the Senator you should be worrying about.