Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
Do you think the New Jersey state legislature would do a better job of selecting a senator than the voters of New Jersey? If given a choice between the Torch and Forrester, who would the legislature have chosen?

I think that it would have helped to appoint senators in the past. But now voters have better access to information.
11 posted on 10/20/2002 8:33:45 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur Wildfire! March
If given a choice between the Torch and Forrester, who would the legislature have chosen?

Ah, but you see, one of the advantages of having a legislature choose senators is that they wouldn't have to pick between only two candidates, the way the voters have to. They can pick anyone they want.

And as for whether the legislature would pick a better senator, I can't say for sure. For one thing, if legislatures pick senators, it would change the way people would elect their state legislatures. Right now, most people couldn't care less who their state reps are, and in many districts they run unopposed. This leads to a complete subservience of state government to the feds. Giving state governments a tie-in to the federal government would change that.

Secondly, senators (and politicians in general) act the way they do in large part because of the influence of political pressure groups, whom they rely on for campaign funding. This would be rendered unnecessary if state legislatures were to choose them, since no senator would have to mount a multi-million dollar political campaign to get a legislature's attention.

17 posted on 10/20/2002 8:52:16 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson