Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drivers of White Vans are being treated as criminals
Vanity | Self

Posted on 10/20/2002 7:48:19 AM PDT by SamAdams76

The photos above currently on the Drudge site concern me. I followed the link and the article clearly stated that nobody was arrested last night.

Why then, do we have drivers of white vans, innocent civilians, evidently being pulled out vans at gunpoint and treated like dangerous criminals? One photo shows a man on the ground, evidently in handcuffs, with police officers standing over him as though they have just captured Whitey Bulger. When I first saw the photo, I figured the man was obviously a wanted criminal that police just so happened to come across during their search. But since there were no arrests last night, this man was obviously released and was no criminal after all.

The other photo shows a man by another white van with his hands in the air and a police officer has a gun drawn on him. Again, this was evidently just another innocent civilian who had the misfortune to be driving a white van on I-95 last night.

Now I understand the need for these roadblocks and for the police to be very thorough in their search for the sniper(s). But I cannot see the point of innocent people dragged out of their vehicles at gunpoint with no pretext other than the fact that they happen to be driving a white van.

Now maybe somebody here has an explanation why these two individuals were treated like criminals. Maybe they tried to evade the police or maybe they were driving stolen vans. But again, there were no arrests made last night. So what is the deal with our citizens being treated like Jesse James just for driving a white van?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,061-1,073 next last
To: spunkets
Where are the guns?
881 posted on 10/20/2002 9:34:39 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
And you really don't see the proximity to D.C. issue? Really?

No. Please explain the issue to me.

882 posted on 10/20/2002 9:35:54 PM PDT by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
Can you imagine the screaming that would go on about multiple, let alone ONE, spy satellite(s) 'looking down' on these people who are already crying in their beer about the rights they have already lost?

There is NO answer that will satisfy these whiners.
883 posted on 10/20/2002 9:36:05 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
By next week the guy on the ground will have been shot in the back of the head.

My guess is the "Don't look in my ashtray!" crowd will have him being shot in the head for having a roach clip on his dash.

884 posted on 10/20/2002 9:36:14 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I bet I could make a lot of money selling car window stickers that say "Dear Mr. Policeman. Don't look in the ashtray."

885 posted on 10/20/2002 9:36:33 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
BTW I just zoomed into the picture and there are not even handcuffs.
886 posted on 10/20/2002 9:36:51 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
SO....so....bad!

You are VERY close to having to ping the little nerd to your post. You realize that don't you?
887 posted on 10/20/2002 9:38:21 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Sure. No problem.

Lawmakers have already been warned to stay off golf courses. Should I elaborate? I'd rather not, if I don't need to.
888 posted on 10/20/2002 9:38:52 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 882 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
The pictures are worth a thousand words.

No... a thousand words about what actually happened here would be worth a thousand pictures.

Because you saw two pictures, one cuffed on the ground and the other not, and you just made a whole series of assumptions to fit your spin. Now they both ate dirt and were held five hours. You just made that up!

889 posted on 10/20/2002 9:40:51 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"This is a national emergency?"

Yep! This IS a national emergency!
If this proves up to be the work of terrorists, we haven't seen the worst of it.
When our military gets involved, even in a support role, it IS a national emergency!
You Ayn Rand idiots can squawk and scream all you want to about the destruction of your individual liberties, but it won't do you a bit of good.
Our law enforcement will do what it takes to find and capture this monster(s).

890 posted on 10/20/2002 9:41:26 PM PDT by COB1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Yeah... might as well get it over with... want I should ping him? ;0)
891 posted on 10/20/2002 9:41:35 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: justshe
As I see it there are 3 choices

Yes, you are right, they will not be satisfied with any level of activity. It would be appropriate for ALL citizens to cooperate, but cooperation is appearantly not is their vocabulary.

They would rather bitch and whine.

892 posted on 10/20/2002 9:42:05 PM PDT by chadsworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Well, we seem to agree that a certain percentage of these kind of stops go wrong, and someone gets injured or killed.

I think the problem here is that the police in this case appear to be applying this to such a large number of "suspect vehicles" that you end up with a very large number of opportunities for something to go wrong.

I'm somewhere in between the two extremes (hard-core libertarians and hard-core authoritarians) that are displayed on this thread. Certainly, in a case like this, the police need to check out leads. But, if those leads are so vague that they cannot narrow their searches to a reasonably small number of vehicles, I think they have to take a less agressive stance towards vehicle occupants, in order to accomplish their ultimate goal, which is to ensure the safety of the general public, including those who happen to have the misfortune to drive white vans.

893 posted on 10/20/2002 9:42:10 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
My God do you mean that you communicate like this sober? Maybe you should get drunk and improve your IQ.

Obviously I could improve my IQ if only I took on your "brain." In your latent and most wildest dreams moron.

894 posted on 10/20/2002 9:42:13 PM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Point to the law being violated.

Is handcuffing and laying a person prone on the pavement because of the style and color of their vehicle legal? If they didn't cooperate that's different but I doubt that's the case. How 'bout excessive force? Or illegal detention? False arrest.

895 posted on 10/20/2002 9:44:01 PM PDT by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Is handcuffing and laying a person prone on the pavement because of the style and color of their vehicle legal? If they didn't cooperate that's different but I doubt that's the case. How 'bout excessive force? Or illegal detention? False arrest.

Yes,no,no and no

896 posted on 10/20/2002 9:45:49 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I don't have a problem with police doing what is necessary to stay safe while they search for an armed and dangerous suspect, either, though.

No one knows why that man is on the ground. Maybe he gave them a reason to put him there. That's more likely than that they just did it for the hell of it.
897 posted on 10/20/2002 9:47:01 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: COB1
Including....and this is laughable to me....having local LEO's on the surveillance aircraft to forward the information from the military on the plane....to those on the ground...because military are not allowed to act in a LEO capacity.

This is absolutely ridiculous. We're talking about someone speaking into a radio from the aircraft to the ground....and we have to add that layer of protection so no laws are broken. So..the military on the aircraft gets the information.....and tells the LEO on the plane....who tells the people on the ground. What utter B.S.
898 posted on 10/20/2002 9:47:10 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"BTW I just zoomed into the picture and there are not even handcuffs."

Of course not, the guy requested that position 'cause he likes layin' on the ground while he's waiting. He does it at the grocery store too.

The pic doesn't allow that kind of resolution.

"Where are the guns?

pic #2, the blonde's holding a stainless semi-auto.

899 posted on 10/20/2002 9:47:19 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
But, if those leads are so vague that they cannot narrow their searches to a reasonably small number of vehicles, I think they have to take a less agressive stance towards vehicle occupants, in order to accomplish their ultimate goal, which is to ensure the safety of the general public

Vague or not... They are operating in the hope and dread that the guy they are after is trapped in that backup. You tell the cop to walk up to those cars without someone ready to act if they've got him.

900 posted on 10/20/2002 9:47:48 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,061-1,073 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson