Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts
But, if those leads are so vague that they cannot narrow their searches to a reasonably small number of vehicles, I think they have to take a less agressive stance towards vehicle occupants, in order to accomplish their ultimate goal, which is to ensure the safety of the general public

Vague or not... They are operating in the hope and dread that the guy they are after is trapped in that backup. You tell the cop to walk up to those cars without someone ready to act if they've got him.

900 posted on 10/20/2002 9:47:48 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies ]


To: HairOfTheDog
Well, using that logic, why not simply do door-to-door no-knock raids in a 100-mile radius of Washington, D.C.?

The police would be armed and ready to shoot, and since they're professionals, the residents have nothing to fear.

Putting aside the constitutional problems with such an idea, don't you think another major argument against doing this would be that it would needlessly put the lives and safety of very large numbers of innocent citizens at risk? That is my point. There are entirely too many innocent people in the class of "people driving white vans" to be pointing loaded firearms at all of them.

911 posted on 10/20/2002 9:54:33 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson