Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drivers of White Vans are being treated as criminals
Vanity | Self

Posted on 10/20/2002 7:48:19 AM PDT by SamAdams76

The photos above currently on the Drudge site concern me. I followed the link and the article clearly stated that nobody was arrested last night.

Why then, do we have drivers of white vans, innocent civilians, evidently being pulled out vans at gunpoint and treated like dangerous criminals? One photo shows a man on the ground, evidently in handcuffs, with police officers standing over him as though they have just captured Whitey Bulger. When I first saw the photo, I figured the man was obviously a wanted criminal that police just so happened to come across during their search. But since there were no arrests last night, this man was obviously released and was no criminal after all.

The other photo shows a man by another white van with his hands in the air and a police officer has a gun drawn on him. Again, this was evidently just another innocent civilian who had the misfortune to be driving a white van on I-95 last night.

Now I understand the need for these roadblocks and for the police to be very thorough in their search for the sniper(s). But I cannot see the point of innocent people dragged out of their vehicles at gunpoint with no pretext other than the fact that they happen to be driving a white van.

Now maybe somebody here has an explanation why these two individuals were treated like criminals. Maybe they tried to evade the police or maybe they were driving stolen vans. But again, there were no arrests made last night. So what is the deal with our citizens being treated like Jesse James just for driving a white van?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,061-1,073 next last
To: bvw
The officer in this case presumably does his duty. But what about the Mercedes?
701 posted on 10/20/2002 7:34:11 PM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
The only thing I see you got going for you is at least you don't post in hot pink lettered font.
702 posted on 10/20/2002 7:35:25 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican; ladyinred
"Sure, I can afford her, you too. I have 50 cents."

Apparently, your mama never taught you any manners, and you make me ashamed to be of the same gender as you...

I am VERY tempted to hit abuse on ya for that, but since it wasn't directed at me, I'll let the Lady make the determination...

703 posted on 10/20/2002 7:35:30 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: All
Enough of this stupid thread. We seem to have a coven of women who hang together to make fairly stupid arguments and bash. No intelligence in that crowd.
704 posted on 10/20/2002 7:36:24 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
Sure, I can afford her, you too. I have 50 cents.

Don't spend your allowance all in one place, kid.

Freaking jerk.

705 posted on 10/20/2002 7:37:03 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
I see. Since you've been proven to be a bogus poster, WE'RE stupid?

Whatever gets your through the night.

706 posted on 10/20/2002 7:37:21 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
It is hardly surprising that you wouldn't recognize a lady when you saw one.

It would take a gentleman to do so.

707 posted on 10/20/2002 7:38:19 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
How novel of you. While I respect the work you have done here, your patronizing response is regrettable. Do you have an opinion or no?
708 posted on 10/20/2002 7:39:15 PM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
Sure, I can afford her, you too. I have 50 cents.

You need a new screen name. That is all I have to say.

709 posted on 10/20/2002 7:41:10 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: cidrasm
It would be nice if this idea was employed, and it would also give plenty of training time for the troops that normally employ these assets

I do have a concern about all of this idea though. What if a hostile enemy WERE PROBING our capabilities. What should we do in that case?

That is were I have a serious problem with the tactics shown the other night. Our society is giving up our very idea of Freedom in order to catch a sniper. Is that how we should react to potentially the actions of just ONE PERSON?

710 posted on 10/20/2002 7:41:55 PM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
Thank you for your reply!

I don't know about other states, but in Texas Penal Code § 38.15 a person commits an offense if the person with criminal negligence interrupts, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes with: (1) a peace officer while the peace officer is performing a duty or exercising authority imposed or granted by law;...

It should be noted however that (d) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the interruption, disruption, impediment, or interference alleged consisted of speech only.

711 posted on 10/20/2002 7:43:56 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
I agree... he can change it to 'PatriarchalAmerican'...
712 posted on 10/20/2002 7:44:30 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
I guess the FR "coven" has another member clearly idenitfied.


Now WHERE oh WHERE would you come up with that terminology? We ALL know.....don't we.....you fraud!
713 posted on 10/20/2002 7:45:45 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Shut up. LOL!!!!!!!!!
714 posted on 10/20/2002 7:46:42 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Yes, in some cases here I am absolutely convinced that you are right.

Hey, what's a mushroom cloud against your Miranda rights?

715 posted on 10/20/2002 7:47:42 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Good to see you posting again Alamo-Girl. I made it to a prayer thread a little late the other day. How you doing girl?
716 posted on 10/20/2002 7:47:48 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Thank you for your post!

Truly I believe things are much better when we put ourselves in the other guy's shoes.

717 posted on 10/20/2002 7:47:48 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
But what if we wear slippers? ;0)

Hi, Alamo-Girl - good to see ya!
718 posted on 10/20/2002 7:48:45 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]

To: chadsworth
"I see one guy on the ground with handcuffs"

Oh, chadsey, you just don't see the whole picture!

You see, this guy was driving home in his white van after a hard day on the job thinking about his beautiful little blonde haired daughter who was waiting in his beautiful little rose covered cottage beside his beautiful blonde haired wife who was soon to be delivering a beautiful blonde haired baby boy and who had cooked a beautiful dinner for her hard working man who was driving along listening to the Christian radio station and giving thanks to the Good Lord for his blessings when all of a sudden he was surrounded by six squad cars containing twelve jack-booted, snarling policemen who grabbed him by the hair and drug - YES, DRUG! - him out of his white van and threw him down on the pavement on his face where one jack-booted, snarling policeman stood on his neck while another kicked him in the groin and a third whacked him with a flashlight while a fourth slapped the handcuffs on him!

You've got to use your imagination when you look at these pictures, chadsey.
My gosh, if it weren't for the imagination of the idiot who posted this thread, we wouldn't even know what happened!

719 posted on 10/20/2002 7:48:56 PM PDT by COB1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Gee, if I didn't know better, I'd swear there were people here who carry their little plastic baggies in their spare tire compartments, and are worried about getting pulled over and having to open up the trunk.
720 posted on 10/20/2002 7:49:58 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,061-1,073 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson