Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S., North Korea near war in 1994 / Clinton got no-nuke vow
New York Daily News ^ | 10/18/02 | KENNETH R. BAZINET

Posted on 10/18/2002 1:55:22 AM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON - The U.S. was on the brink of war with North Korea in 1994 before Pyongyang agreed to halt its nuclear weapons program, sources said yesterday.

"It went down to the wire," said a diplomatic source in the Clinton administration. "The American people will never know how close we were to war."

The revelation came a day after the stunning announcement that Pyongyang admitted to U.S. officials last month that it continued its nuclear weapons program despite the agreement.

The program probably has produced one or two enriched-uranium bombs, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said yesterday.

Sources said the Bush administration would adopt a low-key approach to the situation.

The North Koreans were working on a plutonium bomb — which is smaller and more powerful than an enriched uranium device, but harder to make — in 1994, when then-President Bill Clinton sent a battery of Patriot missiles to South Korea to shoot down missiles fired from the North, at least two Stealth bombers and additional troops.

A U.S. submarine also was also sent on "a close-in mission" off North Korea.

"Had they not accepted, we had 50,000 troops on the [demilitarized zone]. We were hell-bent about stopping them," the ex-State Department source said.

Urged to suspend work

Clinton also dispatched Assistant Secretary of State Robert Gallucci to Pyongyang to urge the Communist regime in 1994 and again in 1995 to accept two light-water reactors — which do not produce weapons-grade nuclear material — from South Korea in exchange for an agreement to suspend its nuclear weapons program.

"He kept us out of a ground war," the source said of Gallucci's effort.

The North Koreans said at the time their nuclear research was meant for energy production — not weapons. Gallucci argued that if their claims were true, there was no reason not to accept the light-water reactors.

"If we hadn't taken those steps, they were on a glide path to producing nuclear weapons," another source close to Clinton said.

The North Koreans now admit they ultimately broke the deal, but they knew in 1994 the U.S. was serious about taking military action to curb the threat to South Korea, Japan and U.S. troops and interests in the region.

Former President Jimmy Carter also traveled to North Korea in 1994, drawing criticism from some in the Clinton White House, who felt he was meddling.

Carter later briefed Clinton, telling him the North Koreans had vowed to suspend production of weapons-grade plutonium.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Clinton also dispatched Assistant Secretary of State Robert Gallucci to Pyongyang to urge the Communist regime in 1994 and again in 1995 to accept two light-water reactors — which do not produce weapons-grade nuclear material — from South Korea in exchange for an agreement to suspend its nuclear weapons program.

Let me see if I understand this.

clinton was going to go to war with N.Korea, but since they accepted two light-water reactors, and promised (as they had done how many times before?) that they would suspend their nuclear weapons program he decided against it?

And this proves what?

1 posted on 10/18/2002 1:55:22 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
And this proves what?

----------------------

It makes Clinton appear involved and presidential.

2 posted on 10/18/2002 2:16:49 AM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; All
 
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/771000/posts
The Atomic Genie- what we have about North Korea's Nuclear program
various FR posts | 10-17-02 | The Heavy Equipment Guy

3 posted on 10/18/2002 2:26:38 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"a diplomatic source in the Clinton administration"

well for starters...somebody is so worried about the trouble they are in they won't sign their name to the lies this article no doubt is filled with.

unnamed sources, breathing...."you don't know how HARD we worked to save you worthless peons... well, I worked harder than I have ever worked before in my life!!!

er... uh... we came so close to war in korea... I just had to go over and give them some missile technology, and saved our asses by the skin amy teeth..."

"WE were as close to war in korea, as I was to hitting osami ben laden with those several hundred million dollars worth of my cruise missiles..."

As the REAL truth of the Clinton legacy, wreaks its way homeward in every theatre of conflict... there will be more and more of this spinning... by his worshippers on the left.

Like taliban fury when confronted with the sorry fact that allah is a pretty fourth rate God, and all around failure... the dems are going wacko over the demise of their lying god, clinton der sinkderbater...

Funny how extremist cult followers act when their false gods are exposed for the frauds they are... funny, and DANGEROUS.

We need that senate majority... NOW.
Looks like North Korea is in our crosshairs before NEXT christmas... so many member of the evil axis... so few the years to end their reign of terror.
4 posted on 10/18/2002 2:29:55 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
how much of carters Peace prize was based on his untiring efforts in N. Korea?
5 posted on 10/18/2002 2:39:11 AM PDT by tm61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
The spring thaw always starts with a drip, drip, drip before it turns into a raging torrent.

Let's hope the torrent marks paid to the Clinton legacy.

For eight years I could barely look at the bum and the sound of his voice was like fingernails on a blackboard to me. Now I can barely type the traitors name.

6 posted on 10/18/2002 2:47:53 AM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I find the article laughable--as in derisive laughter.

North Korea Admits Nuclear Weapons Program
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/770463/posts

It's a long read (the whole thread) but very insightful because of the fascinating entries from various freepers.

There is no place better than FR if you are trying to understand an issue!

7 posted on 10/18/2002 3:03:54 AM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The American people will never know how close we were to war."

So essentially, clinton surrrendered to the NK's. The ongoing clinton legacy spin machine is pathetic to watch. Other administrations quietly go away but not this crowd.

8 posted on 10/18/2002 3:05:36 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Eight years of the clintons and their crowd has brought us to where we are today. It's no wonder that they feel the need to constantly make excuses for the lack of any leadership.

The "dirty joke" prezident has nearly done us in.

9 posted on 10/18/2002 3:11:57 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
So what this article is trying to see s that one pack of pathological liars (the Clintonoids) was negotiating with another pack of pathological liars (NK) and they reached an agreement. Therefore the first pack did not go to war with the second pack.

This story is silly on its face.

However, it is more likely that we get the truth from a future North Korea than the Clintonoids, because the first group is capable of reform in the long run while the second group is prepared to take its lies to the grave.
10 posted on 10/18/2002 3:13:13 AM PDT by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I don't recall a prolonged Congressional debate or hand wringing in the UN about "preemptive action" against NK. I must have missed all the media stories about the US being a bully.

But the Clinton administration was on the brink of war?

They would have acted unilaterally?

Fat chance. This is a CYA story. Sorry Bubba, your "legacy" unravels more everyday


11 posted on 10/18/2002 3:33:38 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Next Shoe to Drop

We Sold Saddam Nukes

12 posted on 10/18/2002 3:34:46 AM PDT by STD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Can we refer to x42 as the Comeback Kid or as a

"The Come Soaked Blow-Up Surrender Doll"

13 posted on 10/18/2002 3:40:00 AM PDT by STD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
There goes Hillary's presidential bid. Everyone knows Bill would still be running things, and few will support that scenario.
14 posted on 10/18/2002 3:42:26 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"And this proves what?"

Simply that Clinton, miserable piece of walking excrement that he is, would do anything to defray a horrible problem long enough to get out of office and dump the problem(s) on others.

15 posted on 10/18/2002 3:44:05 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
Simply that Clinton, miserable piece of walking excrement that he is, would do anything to defray a horrible problem long enough to get out of office and dump the problem(s) on others.

Bump

16 posted on 10/18/2002 3:49:42 AM PDT by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Two years ago I was passing around my Twenty Reasons to Vote For George W. Bush.

Number 5 on the list was exactly this.

5. Bush knows we have been paying nuclear blackmail to North Korea for several years and that it is the worst immediate foreign affairs problem he has to solve. He will draw on a host of top quality advisors to tackle this difficult and dangerous situation.

17 posted on 10/18/2002 3:51:55 AM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tm61
how much of carters Peace prize was based on his untiring efforts in N. Korea?

Good question … and note the timing: Peace Prize last week – Korean Nukes this week.

18 posted on 10/18/2002 3:54:59 AM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
HAHAHAAHAHAAHA!
19 posted on 10/18/2002 4:03:17 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Former President Jimmy Carter also traveled to North Korea in 1994, drawing criticism from some in the Clinton White House, who felt he was meddling.

Carter later briefed Clinton, telling him the North Koreans had vowed to suspend production of weapons-grade plutonium.

Hmmm, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Madelin Albright, with this group of foreign policy heavyweights, it's amazing we have a country left at all!! What a mess! Thanks Billy bub for more of your pathetic legacy.

20 posted on 10/18/2002 4:03:41 AM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson