Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demand for more ugly people on TV
aftenposten ^ | 10/17/02

Posted on 10/17/2002 1:09:55 PM PDT by Ranger

Lecturer Trond Andresen of the Norwegian Institute of Technology in Trondheim accuses the media of discriminating against the ugly and emphasizing beautiful people whenever possible. Andresen wants higher ugly quotas on television.

"Ugly people should be spotlighted in the media in the same way that the media wishes to emphasize persons from ethnic minorities," Andresen, a lecture at the Department of Engineering Cybernetics, said to newspaper Bergens Tidende.

Andresen blasts journalists, photographers and TV producers for concentrating on beautiful faces and bodies and accuses the press of choosing attractive interviewees from schools or the workplace, and avoiding others.

Andresen compares the phenomenon with racial discrimination. "Ugly people are as ignored today as dark-skinned people. They are told daily that they are inferior. This isn't done openly, but indirectly, by overlooking them, by focusing on appearance in advertising, TV-series, magazines, schools and in groups," Andresen said.

Andresen believes the focus on appearance is a serious social problem that makes young people insecure and increases their own dissatisfaction with how they look. Possible outcomes are eating disorders, psychological problems and cosmetic surgery.

Andresen doesn't find it easy to argue his case.

"If I were chosen for a TV debate I would obviously be assessed by viewers - not for what I had said, but for how I looked," Andresen said.

The academic has suggestions about how to combat the situation; with a choice of subjects to interview, do not approach the attractive ones - instead give the ugly a higher quota. Andresen also advises that media reports ignore mentioning appearance if it is not directly relevant.

Researcher Wencke Mühleisen at the Center for Women and Gender Research backs Andresen and agrees the media should be giving the ugly more exposure.

TV 2 news editor Kjell Oevre-Helland, on the other hand, could not agree less.

"Claiming that we consciously pick out the best looking people to interview is absurd and totally meaningless. That would mean that we depart from the main point of journalism, which is to talk to those who have influence and something important to say. That often means middle-aged men without particularly attractive characteristics," Oevre-Helland said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: buttugly; fuglyquotas; hillaryalert; ratalert; renoalert; television
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
The academic has suggestions about how to combat the situation; with a choice of subjects to interview, do not approach the attractive ones - instead give the ugly a higher quota.

Well, if he tied pork chops to their ears maybe the dogs would play with them. For my vote, looking at Hillary and child is enough ugly in my media diet.

1 posted on 10/17/2002 1:09:55 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Well, Phil Donahue is on weekday nights, and he's ugly.
Oh, thats right, he doesn't have an audience.
2 posted on 10/17/2002 1:12:42 PM PDT by AdvisorB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Helen "The Terrible" Thomas' digusting mug is on my tv screen way too often ......That's a large enough dose of 'ugly' for me.
3 posted on 10/17/2002 1:13:08 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
I still have flash backs and nightmares of the photo with Hillary in a bathing suit. Also with the Queen Mum and all you'd think the Brits would have enough as well.
4 posted on 10/17/2002 1:13:12 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Pinging for Madeline Halfbright and Janet El-Reno!
5 posted on 10/17/2002 1:13:37 PM PDT by GunsareOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
LOL

Get a Life.
6 posted on 10/17/2002 1:14:50 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
The Barbra Streisand Show?

Affimative Action for Anteaters look-alikes.
7 posted on 10/17/2002 1:15:15 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
I would like to take this opportunity and submit myself as a candidate for the position.
8 posted on 10/17/2002 1:15:30 PM PDT by SERE_DOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
There must be some mistake. The link brought me to some site in Norway, not The Onion.
9 posted on 10/17/2002 1:15:44 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
"Claiming that we consciously pick out the best looking people to interview is absurd and totally meaningless..."

...but true!

10 posted on 10/17/2002 1:15:48 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
This guy has obviously never seen Rosie O'Donnel.
11 posted on 10/17/2002 1:17:11 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COB1; LadyX; Scuttlebutt; razorback-bert; Billie; beowolf; Fred Mertz; humblegunner; Eaker; ...
All is not lost.

Here's a place for all of us until we sail again...

12 posted on 10/17/2002 1:18:23 PM PDT by ofMagog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
I keep seeing Hillary and Chelsea and Rosie on tv. They should "tip" the scales way back to even.
13 posted on 10/17/2002 1:18:40 PM PDT by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERE_DOC
If they pay's right, count me in.
14 posted on 10/17/2002 1:18:41 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Demand for more ugly people on TV

Oh yeah, Rosie O'Donnell is no longer on TV.

15 posted on 10/17/2002 1:19:06 PM PDT by maximus@Nashville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
"If I were chosen for a TV debate I would obviously be assessed by viewers - not for what I had said, but for how I looked," Andresen said.

Haven't they been saying that since Nixon took on Kennedy in 1960?

16 posted on 10/17/2002 1:22:13 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
"Ugly people are as ignored today as dark-skinned people.

What nonsense. If you were an alien that tried to gauge the representation of different ethic groups by watching TV, you would think whites and Asians made up about 50 percent of the population and blacks and latinos made up the other 50 percent.

17 posted on 10/17/2002 1:27:40 PM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ofMagog
Thanks for the ping. This is toooo funny!!
18 posted on 10/17/2002 1:27:47 PM PDT by JustAmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Don't hate me because I'm beautiful.
19 posted on 10/17/2002 1:30:15 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
I would be interested in seeing the reactions of the people they tap as ugly enough to fill the quota.
20 posted on 10/17/2002 1:30:47 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson